摘要
为评估耳穴贴压在电子结肠镜检查中的安全性、有效性和优越性,将1310例患者随机分为3组,治疗组为耳穴贴压,对照组为静脉麻醉,空白组为常规肠镜检查,在结肠镜检查中及检查后24h内对患者腹痛等情况进行评分。结果显示,治疗组行电子结肠镜检查成功率99.1%,到达盲肠平均时间为(5.61±4.60)min,检查时腹痛评分为(3.07±2.70)分,检查后24h腹痛评分为(1.25±0.5)分。检查前后无恶心呕吐、手足痉挛、汗出、肠出血、肠穿孔、心脑血管意外等并发症的发生。检查后患者身体即时恢复,无需继续留院观察。与对照组及空白组比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结果表明,耳穴贴压应用于电子结肠镜检查中镇痛效果明显,简便易行,安全有效且副作用少,性价比高。
This stduy was to evaluate the safety,effectiveness and advantages of ear-pressing therapy used in electro-colonoscopy(EC), randomly divided 1 310 patients to be subject to this examination into three groups.treatment group receiving ear-pressing therapy, control group receiving intravenous anesthesia, and blank group receiving routine enteroscopy;the took score on patients abdominal pain and so on within 24 hr.after exam.and at intra-examination. As results,in treatment group EC detected success rate was up to 99.1% ,the averaged time of it to cecum was (5.61±4.60) min,the score on abdominal pain at exam.was (3.07±2.70) points,at 24 hr. after exam. decreased to (1.25±0.5) points;before and after exam. nausea and vomiting, sapsm of hands and feet, diaphoresis, enterorrhagia, enterobrosis, as well cardio-cerebral vas cular event and other complications didfft occur after exam. Patient's body recovered immediately after ex am. no-needing continuous observation in hospital. Compared with control and blank group, there all was statistical difference( P 〈0.05).Results show that ear-pressing therapy used in EC has significant analgesia efficacy and high cost-effective,is safe, effective and of less side effect,its operation is easy & simple.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2017年第1期54-56,共3页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词
耳穴贴压
电子结肠镜
镇痛
Ear-pressing therapy
Electro colonoscope
Anagesia