摘要
以Web of Science数据库收录的制度逻辑文献为研究对象,采用文献计量方法对制度逻辑研究的文献外部特征和学科知识结构及其研究热点与趋势进行分析。研究发现:第一,制度逻辑研究领域的学科知识结构由6个部分构成:竞争逻辑、制度变迁与组织实践;制度与组织关系研究;多重制度环境、混合型组织和制度创业;多重制度逻辑、竞争逻辑与组织战略反应;制度化、制度理论与制度变迁;组织合法性、组织场域与战略反应。第二,制度逻辑研究热点趋势主要包括竞争逻辑下的组织战略反应、制度创业与合法性、新兴经济体国家的制度逻辑与组织战略反应以及不同层次政府制度逻辑对组织影响等4大主题类团。最后,提出制度逻辑可拓展的研究领域和研究方法。
This paper uses bibliometric analysis method to investigate the external features,scientific knowledge structure,hotspots and trends of institutional logics field based on Web of Science database from its launch in 1998 to 2015,and obtains the following results:First,the scientific knowledge structure of institutional logics research field consists of six parts: competing logics,institutional change and organizational practice; the relationship between institutions and organizations; multiple institutional environments,hybrid organizations and institutional entrepreneurship; multiple institutional logics,competing logics and organizational strategic response; institutionalization,institutional theory and institutional change; organizational legitimacy,organizational field and strategic response. Second,the hotspots and trends of institutional logics researches are composed of four types of theme groups: organizational strategic response under competing logics; institutional entrepreneurship and legitimacy; institutional logics and organizational strategic response in emerging economies; influence of different levels of government institutional logics on organizations. Finally,some suggestions are put forward about the future academic research direction and management practice of institutional logics.
出处
《管理评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期90-109,共20页
Management Review
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(15JZD020)
国家自然科学基金项目(71102052
71402055)
国家社会科学基金重点项目(15AGL003)
教育部人文社会科学基金项目(14JCZH142
15YJAZH083)
广东省高等学校优秀青年教师培养计划项目(YQ2015060)
广东省教育厅人文社科项目(2012WYM_0010
2013WYXM0032)
关键词
制度逻辑
制度理论
制度复杂性
战略反应
制度创业
组织场域
合法性
文献计量分析
institutional logics
institutional theory
institutional complexity
strategic response
institutional entrepreneurship
organizational field
legitimacy
bibliometric analysis