期刊文献+

不同方法治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的疗效 被引量:27

Efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab or Conbercept combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察玻璃体腔注射康柏西普与雷珠单抗联合黄斑区格栅样激光光凝(macular laser grid photocoagulation,MLG)治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(branch retinal vein occlusion,BRVO)继发黄斑水肿(macular edema,ME)的疗效。方法:按照计算机产生随机数将BRVO继发ME患者120例120眼分为3组,各40例40眼,A组:单纯行MLG;B组:玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗(0.05mL/0.5mg)1wk后给予MLG治疗;C组:玻璃体腔注射康柏西普(0.05mL/0.5mg)1wk后给予MLG治疗。三组治疗后1mo根据复查FFA、OCT结果对效果不佳患者可重复注射药物。随访6mo,对比B组和C组重复注射率。观察各组治疗前及治疗后1wk,1、3、6mo最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA)、黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度(central macular thickness,CMT)结果,统计各组并发症。结果:B组患者连续注射雷珠单抗2次者4眼,连续注射3次者7眼,重复注射率27.5%,C组均注射1次,B组重复注射率比C组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组患者治疗后BCVA较治疗前均得到提高,CMT均较治疗前变薄,但B组和C组治疗后BCVA均高于A组,且CMT低于A组。另外,治疗后C组BCVA高于B组,CMT低于B组,但B组和C组BCVA和CMT、比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);直至随访结束,三组患者均无明显不良反应,B组与C组患者均未复发,A组复发率25%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:玻璃体腔注射康柏西普与雷珠单抗联合激光光凝治疗BRVO继发ME疗效均佳,但康柏西普联合激光治疗注射次数相对较少。 ·AIM: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab or conbercept combined with macular laser grid photocoagulation ( MLG ) for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion ( BRVO) . ·METHODS: Totally 120 patients ( 120 eyes ) with BRVO were randomized into three groups, 40 patients (40 eyes) in each group. Group A received MLG alone; Group B:intravitreal injection of ranibizumab 0. 05mL/0. 5mg;Group C: intravitreal injection of conbercept 0. 05mL/0. 5mg. MLG were performed in Group B and Group A at 1wk after injection. At 1mo after injection, all the patients were examined with fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography, repeated injections were given if necessary. Repeated injection rate of Group B and C was compared after a six-month follow-up. before and at 1wk, 1, 3, 6mo after treatment, best corrected visual acuity ( BCVA ) and central macular thickness ( CMT ) of the two groups were analyzed. ·RESULTS: In Group B, there were 4 eyes with 2 consecutive injections, 7 eyes with 3 consecutive injections, and the repeated injection rate was 27. 5%. Patients in Group C received injection only once. The repeated injection rate of Group B was higher than that of Group C with significant difference (P〈0. 05). BCVA of the three groups were improved after treatment, CMT was less than those before treatment. BCVA of Group B and C after treatment was better than those of Group A and CMT was less. BCVA of Group C was better than that of Group&amp;nbsp;B, and CMT was less without significant difference ( P〉0. 05). After the follow-up, there were no significant adverse reactions in three groups. The recurrence rate of group A was 25%, no recurrence in Group B and C and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0. 05). ·CONCLUSION: Intravitreal ranibizumab or Conbercept combined with laser photocoagulation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion is effective. But injection times of Conbercept is less.
作者 白石
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2017年第4期648-651,共4页 International Eye Science
关键词 视网膜分支静脉阻塞 黄斑水肿 康柏西普 雷珠单抗 格栅样光凝疗法 branch retinal vein occlusion macular edema Conbercept ranibizumab pattern photocoagulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献171

  • 1赵明威,胡庆军,黎晓新.玻璃体内注射曲安奈德治疗黄斑水肿临床研究的现状分析[J].中华眼底病杂志,2005,21(4):220-223. 被引量:24
  • 2Mclntosh RL, Rogers SL, 1.im 1., et al. Natural history of central retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based syslemalic review. Ophthalmology, 2010,117 : 1113-1123.
  • 3Rogers SL, Mclntosh RL, I.im 1., et al. Natural history of branch retinal vein occlusion: an evidence based systematic review. Ophtha[mology, 2010,117 : 1094-I 101.
  • 4. Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion: the Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol, 1984,98 : 271 282.
  • 5Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion: the Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M report. Ophthalmology, 1995,102 : 1425-1433.
  • 6Noma H, Funatsu H, Mimura T, eta[. Macular sensitivity and morphology after intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonidc for macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina, 2012,32..1844-1852.
  • 7Park CH, Jaffe GJ, Fekrat S. Intravitreal triamcinolone aeetonide in eyes with cystoid macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol, 2003,136 : ,119 425.
  • 8Cekiq O, Chang S, Tseng JJ, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone injection for treatment of maeu[ar edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina,2005,25:851-855.
  • 9JonasJB, Akkoyun l, Kamppcter B, et al. Branch rctinal vein occlusion treated by intravhrcal triamcinolone acetonide. Eye (Lond) ,2005,19:65-71.
  • 10Cheng KC, Wu WC, I.in CJ. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for patients with macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion in Taiwan. Eye (Lond),2009,23:849-857.

共引文献194

同被引文献174

引证文献27

二级引证文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部