摘要
目的分析不同通气模式治疗重症肺源性心脏病呼吸衰竭患者的临床效果。方法选取我院收治的重症肺源性心脏病呼吸衰竭患者92例为研究对象,根据治疗方式的不同分为观察组和对照组,各46例。观察组患者进行有创无创序贯通气治疗,对照组患者实施有创通气治疗,比较两组患者的临床效果。结果治疗后,两组患者的临床各指标明显优于治疗前,且观察组患者各临床指标明显优于对照组患者(P<0.05);观察组患者的并发症发生率明显低于对照组患者(P<0.05)。结论有创无创序贯通气疗法应用于重症肺源性心脏病呼吸衰竭患者治疗中具有治疗时间短、患者机体功能恢复快、并发症少等优点具有较高的临床应用价值。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of different ventilation modes on pulmonary heart disease patients with severe respiratory failure. Methods Ninety-two cases of pulmonary heart disease patients with severe respiratory failure admitted in our hospital were selected, all the patients were divided into observation group and control group according to different treatment, with 46 cases in each group. The observation group received sequential invasive and noninvasive ventilation, while the control group accepted invasive ventilation. The clinical effects of two groups were compared. Results After treatment, the levels of clinical indicators of two groups were better than those before treatment, and the levels of clinical indicators of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P〈0.05). The complication rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Sequential invasive and noninvasive ventilation on pulmonary heart disease patients with severe respiratory failure has the advantage of shorter treatment time, quicker recovery of patients" body function and fewer complications, which has high application value.
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2017年第8期18-19,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
不同通气模式
重症肺源性心脏病
呼吸衰竭
different ventilation modes
pulmonary heart disease
severe respiratory failure