期刊文献+

一体式MBR工艺处理养猪沼液的中试研究 被引量:11

PILOT STUDY ON TREATMENT OF DIGESTED PIGGERY WASTEWATER WITH A SUBMERGED MBR PROCESS
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对浙江嘉兴某规模化养猪场沼液水质特点,建立一体式膜生物反应器(MBR)系统,着重考察不同运行状况下系统的长期运行稳定性。结果表明:系统运行效果稳定高效,当进水ρ(氨氮)为462~1 764 mg/L(平均862 mg/L),碳氮比为3.2~0.66(平均1.7)条件下,系统出水ρ(COD)和ρ(氨氮)分别为(241.6±74.8)mg/L和(26.6±29.3)mg/L,满足甚至优于DB 33/593—2005《浙江省畜禽养殖业污染物排放标准》。系统总抗生素同步去除效率达80%以上,Cu、Zn、Fe、Mn去除率分别为87.5%、94.1%、92.7%和94.2%。 The pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor( MBR) process was developed to investigate the stable running performance on treating the digested piggery wastewater from a large-scale piggery farm in Jiaxing,Zhejiang Province. The results showed that the treatment effect of the system was stable and satisfactory. When the influent ammonia nitrogen was 462~ 1 764 mg/L( mean value of 862 mg/L) and COD/TN was 3. 2 ~ 0. 66( mean value of 1. 7),the effluent concentrations of COD and ammonia nitrogen were respectively( 241. 6 ± 74. 8) mg/L and( 26. 6 ± 29. 3) mg/L. Therefore,the system effluent quality was superior to the "Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry Pollutant Discharge Standards in Zhejiang Province"( DB 33/593—2005). Moreover,the synchronous removal performance of heavy metals and antibiotics were efficient with Cu,Zn,Fe,Mn of 87. 5%,94. 1%,92. 7%,94. 2%,respectively,and the whole antibiotics of higher than 80%.
出处 《环境工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期47-51,共5页 Environmental Engineering
基金 浙江省重大科技专项(2014C03022) 嘉兴市科技计划项目(2015AY23004)
关键词 养猪沼液 MBR 抗生素 重金属 digested piggery wastewater membrane bioreactors antibiotics heavy metals
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1张树清,张夫道,刘秀梅,王玉军,邹绍文,何绪生.规模化养殖畜禽粪主要有害成分测定分析研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):822-829. 被引量:400
  • 2王冉,刘铁铮,王恬.抗生素在环境中的转归及其生态毒性[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):265-270. 被引量:198
  • 3王兰.抗生素污染现状及对环境微生态的影响[J].药物生物技术,2006,13(2):144-148. 被引量:45
  • 4USDA/NASS. 2002 Census of Agriculture and Historical Highlights [M].Washington DC, USDA. 2006.
  • 5Osterberg D, David Wallinga. Addressing Externalities from swine production to reduce public health and environmental impacts[J]. American journal of public Health 2004,94(10):1703-1709.
  • 6Walliams H. Fighting corporate Swine[J]. politics and society, 2006, 34(3):369-398.
  • 7Cochran K, Rudek J, Whittle D. Dollars and Sense: An Economic Analysis of Alternative Hog Waste Management Technologies[M]. Washington, DC, Environmental Defense, 2002:78-79.
  • 8Ribaudo M, Cattaneo A, Agapoff J. Cost of Meeting Manure Nutrient Application Standards in Hog Production: The Roles of EQIP and Fertilizer Offsets[J]. Review of Agricultural Economics, 2004, 26(4):430-444.
  • 9McBride W N. Key Economic and Structural Relationships in US Hog Production[M].Washington, DC, USDA/ERS, 2003.
  • 10国家环境保护总局.水和废水监测分析方法[M](第四版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002..

共引文献100

同被引文献191

引证文献11

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部