期刊文献+

不同粘结剂对种植体周围龈沟液pH值影响的临床研究 被引量:6

Clinical trial of effects of different cements on the pH of peri-implant crevicular fluid
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀和自粘结树脂水门汀对龈沟液pH值的影响。方法将粘结固位种植义齿修复患者15例(30颗种植体)随机分为对照组15例(15颗种植体)和试验组15例(15颗种植体)。对照组予以自粘结树脂水门汀;试验组予以树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀。另选牙周健康的天然牙患者15例为空白组,每例1颗。于固位前和固位后6,12个月时,比较3组患者的龈沟液pH值和改良菌斑指数。结果固位前和固位后6,12个月,试验组的龈沟液pH值分别为(7.19±0.47),(7.30±0.51),(7.38±0.55),改良菌斑指数分别为(0.43±0.35),(0.51±0.36),(0.54±0.45);对照组的龈沟液pH值分别为(7.20±0.55),(7.39±0.48),(7.85±0.53),改良菌斑指数分别为(0.42±0.41),(0.53±0.45),(0.92±0.59);空白组的龈沟液pH值分别为(7.21±0.52),(7.22±0.55),(7.29±0.49),改良菌斑指数分别为(0.44±0.35),(0.48±0.25),(0.50±0.46)。固位后12个月,试验组和空白组的龈沟液pH值和改良菌斑指数与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。改良菌斑指数与龈沟液pH值存在正相关关系。结论树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀对种植体周围龈沟液pH值的影响较小。 Objective To investigate the influence of two kinds of different cements(resin-reinforced glass ionomer and self-adhesive resin cement) to the pH of peri-implant crevicular fluid of cement retained implant restorations.Methods About 15 patients for cement retained implant restorations with a total of 30 dental implants were chosen for study.The implants were randomly divided into two groups,treatment group for the resin-reinforced glass ionomer,and control group for the self-adhesive resin cement,with 15 implants in each group.Another 15 patients were chosen to observe 1 healthy tooth and periodonatal tissue from each of them as blank group.The pH of peri-implant crevicular fluid and meliorate plaque index were measured respectively before the crowns were bonded,after 6 months and 12 months.The measured results during different periods were compared.Results Before the crowns were bonded,after 6 months and 12 months the pH of peri-implant crevicular fluid of treatment group were(7.19 ± 0.47),(7.30 ± 0.51),(7.38 ± 0.55),meliorate plaque index were(0.43 ± 0.35),(0.51 ±0.36),(0.54 ± 0.45);the pH of peri-implant crevicular fluid of control group were(7.20 ±0.55),(7.39 ±0.48),(7.85 ± 0.53),meliorate plaque index were(0.42 ±0.41),(0.53 ±0.45),(0.92 ±0.59);the pH of gingival crevicular fluid of blank group were(7.21 ±0.52),(7.22 ± 0.55),(7.29 ± 0.49),meliorate plaque index were(0.44 ± 0.35),(0.48 ± 0.25),(0.50 ±0.46).Tweleve months after the crowns were bonded,pH of gingival crevicular fluid and meliorate plaque index in control group were significantly higher than that in treatment group and blank group.There was a positive correlativity between meliorate plaque index and pH of gingival crevicular fluid.Conclusion Resin-reinforced glass ionomer has less effect on the pH of peri-implant crevicular fluid.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期506-508,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金 佳木斯大学研究生科技创新基金资助项目(LZR2015_016)
关键词 树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀 自粘结树脂水门汀 种植体 龈沟液pH值 resin-reinforced glass ionomer self-adhesive resin cement dental implant pH of gingival crevicular fluid
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1杨德圣,伊元夫,贾静.三种粘接材料对种植牙冠短期固位和可拆卸性影响的研究[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2011,9(3):178-181. 被引量:5
  • 2夏荣,赵云凤.有限元法及其进展(一)[J].中国口腔种植学杂志,1997,2(2):96-100. 被引量:24
  • 3Abt E., Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Growing body of evidence on survival rates of implant-supported fixed prostheses[J]. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2008, 9(2): 51-52.
  • 4Lee A, Okayasu K, Wang H L. Screw-versus cement-re- tained implant restorations: current concepts [J]. Implant Dentistry, 2010, 19(1): 8-15.
  • 5Shadid R, Sadaqa N.A comparison between screw and ce- ment-retained implant prostheses. A literature review [J]. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2012, 38(3): 298-307.
  • 6Gervais M J, Wilson P R. A rationale for retrievability of fixed, implant-supported prostheses: a complication-based analysis[J]. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2007, 20 (1): 13-24.
  • 7Lewis M B, Klineberg I. Prosthodontic considerations de- signed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature [J]. Australian dental journal, 2011, 56(2): 181-192.
  • 8Hill E E, Lott J. A clinically focused discussion of luting ma- terials[J]. Australian dental journal, 2011, 56(1): 67-76.
  • 9Breeding L C, Dixon D L, Bogacki M T, et al. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I [J]. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1992, 68(5): 737-741.
  • 10Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Ebrahimi M, et al. Retentiveness of implant-supported metal copings using different luting a- gents[J]. Dental research journal, 2012, 9(1): 13-18.

共引文献11

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部