期刊文献+

评价表对初三学生化学实验方案写作表现的影响 被引量:2

Effects of Error Checklist on Ninth Grade Students’ Writing Performance of Experiment Schemes
原文传递
导出
摘要 以60名初三学生为研究参与者,了解教师在自行设计的物质鉴别和检验实验方案评价表中控制反馈信息数量时,对不同学业水平学生的实验方案写作表现(写作得分和写作自我效能)的影响。研究发现,不管教师是否向学生反馈具体的作答错误,低分组均显著提高写作得分和一般提高写作自我效能,而且实验班低分组在后测的写作得分显著高于对照班低分组。当教师反馈具体的作答错误,高分组仅显著提高写作自我效能。最后提出若干教学和研究建议。 An error checklist of substances identification and test experiment scheme was de- signed to evaluate students~ written outcome and get students' feedback. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of feedback on experiment scheme score and writing self-efficacy of students of different achievement levels. The 60 ninth grade students participated in this study. The experimental class received experiment scheme scores and error types but control class only scores. The results of this study were as followed: (1) low score groups of experimental class and control class scored in experiment scheme post-test significantly higher than in pre-test, low score groups of experimental class scored in post-test significantly higher than control class; (2) low score groups of experimental class and control class scored in writing self-efficacy post-test higher than in pre-test, high score group of experimental class scored in post-test significantly higher than in pre-test. Adviees of instruction and research were proposed.
出处 《化学教育》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第7期29-34,共6页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 评价表 详细反馈 认知反馈 实验方案 写作表现 写作自我效能 error checklist elaborated feedback cognitive feedback experiment scheme writing performance writing self-dficacy
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献157

  • 1杨敬清.提高英语写作评改有效性的反馈机制──实验与分析[J].外语界,1996(3):41-45. 被引量:170
  • 2蔡兰珍.“任务教学法”在大学英语写作中的应用[J].外语界,2001(4):41-46. 被引量:242
  • 3Ashwell, T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 227-257.
  • 4Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kind of er ror feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing[J].Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 267-296.
  • 5Doughty, C. &J. Williams. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 6Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 7Fathman, A. &E. Whalley. 1990. Teacher response to student writing, Focus on form versus content [A]. In B. Kroll (ed.). Second Language Writing, Research Insights for the Classroom [C]. Cambridge, CUP. 178-190.
  • 8Ferris, D. 1999. The case for grammar correction in L2 Writing classes: A response to Truscott [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 1-11.
  • 9Ferris, D. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • 10Ferris, D. & B. Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be [J]? Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161- 184.

共引文献528

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部