期刊文献+

参数化认知诊断模型:心理计量特征、比较及其转换 被引量:10

Diagnosis Model Based on Parametrization Cognition:Psychological Measurement Characteristics,Comparison and Transformation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与项目反应理论(IRT)相比,认知诊断(CD)因能提供更为细致、丰富的诊断信息而深受国内外研究者的推崇,并成为现代心理测量理论的核心;而认知诊断模型(CDMs)则是实现诊断功能的核心技术环节,认知诊断模型的好坏直接决定着认知诊断的准确性及有效性。本文以模型分类、模型计量学特征、模型假设、模型适用范围以及模型间的数学转换关系为视角,对国际上十几种常用参数化认知诊断模型进行归纳、综述及评价,为实际应用者在认知诊断模型比较与选用上提供借鉴和参考。 Compared with the item response, theory (IRT), Cognitive Diagnosis (CD)can provide more meticulous and abundant diagnostic information, so it is deeply respected by researchers at home and abroad, and has become the core of the modem psychological measurement theory. Cogni- tive diagnostic models (CDMs) are core technologies of realizing diagnostic functions, and directly de- termine the accuracy and validity of cognitive diagnosis. From the perspective of the model classifica- tion, the model metrology characteristics, the model assumptions, the applicable scope of the model and the mathematical transformation relationship between models, the paper sums up, reviews and e- valuates more than 10 kinds of common parameterized model of cognitive diagnosis, and provides an important reference for the actual users in cognitive diagnosis model comparison and selection.
出处 《江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期88-104,共17页 Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 认知诊断评估 认知诊断模型 链接型与分离型 约束化模型 一般化模型 cognitive diagnostic assessment Cognition Diagnosis Model link - type and separation -type constraint model generalized model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1戴海崎,张青华.规则空间模型在描述统计学习模式识别中的应用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):949-951. 被引量:39
  • 2康春花,戴海崎.采用LLTM作测量与认知结合研究的初步探讨[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):569-572. 被引量:17
  • 3余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 4黄山,瞿笔玄,顾秋艳,曹亦薇.(2008).贝叶斯网络模型在阅读理解测验中的应用.云南昆明,第八届全国教育与心理统计测量学术年会.
  • 5涂冬波,漆书青.(2008).认知诊断计量模型的开发及应用.中国科技论文在线.2009.08.30取自http://www.paper999.com/paper_nozb5c/.
  • 6谢典佑,吴任婕,郭伯臣,许天维.(2008).以贝氏网络与区块平衡为基础之适性选题策略.云南昆明,第八届全国教育与心理统计测量学术年会.
  • 7Almond, R. G., DiBcllo, L., Moulder, B., & Zapata-Rivcra, J. D. (2007).. Modeling diagnostic assessments with Bayesian networks. Journal of Educational Measurement 44, 341-359.
  • 8DiBello, L. W., & Stout. W. (2007). Editors' Introduction and overview: IRT-based cognitive diagnostic models and related methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44. 285-291.
  • 9DiBello, L. W., Stout, W. F., & Roussos, L. A. (1995). Unified cognitive/psychometric diagnosis assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. In: Nichols, P. D., Chipman, S. F., & Brennan, R. L., (Eds). Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment (pp.361-389). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 10Fischer, G. H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37. 359-374.

共引文献42

同被引文献60

引证文献10

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部