《潜夫论》引用经书问题研究

Research on Qianfulun Citing Confucian Classics

《潜夫论》对经书内容引用很多。在引用方式上主要有明引和暗引两种,也存在只引经书名称或具体篇章名称而不引文句内容的情况。《潜夫论》对不同经书内容的关注度和侧重点有所不同,兼顾今古文经,体现了东汉中后期今古文经融合的发展趋势。《潜夫论》对经书的引用是汉代学术发展的一个必然结果,同王符的"明道、征圣、宗经"的儒家学术观有着直接关系,是王符对儒家经典的一种理解和诠释。对《潜夫论》引经书内容的分析既突出了王符的学术特点,也再次表明了经今古文问题的复杂性。

The Qianfulun had largely cited the Confucian classics. The citation means were mainly divided direct and indirect ci- tation two forms, also existed the situations that only citing the names of the Confucian classics or specific chapter names without citing textual content. Attention and focus of Qianfulun to different contents of Confucian classics were distinct, the citation to Confucian classics reflected the development trend of integration of the pre - Qin script Confucian classics and clerical script Confucian classics in the late Eastern Han Dynasty. The Qianfulun ＇ s citation to Confucian classics was an inevitable result of academic development in Han Dynasty Confucian era, had a direct relationship with Wang Fu＇ s Confucian academic concept of ＂Mingdao, learning saints, learning classics＂, was Wang Fu＇ s understanding and annotation of Confucian classics. The analysis on Qianfulun citing Confucian classics highlighted Wang Fu＇ s academic characteristics, also showed the complexity between the pre -Qin script Confucian classics and clerical script Confucian classics.