口腔种植修复和常规固定修复在牙列缺损治疗中的疗效对比分析

Comparison of Curative Effect of Oral Implantation and Conventional Fixation Repair in Treatment of Dentition Defects

目的对比口腔种植修复和常规固定修复在牙列缺损治疗中的疗效观察。方法回顾性分析2016年2—9月来我院进行治疗的86例牙列缺损患者(90颗患牙)的临床资料,按照随机数字表法分为两组,每组43例(45颗患牙),对照组给予常规固定修复,研究组给予口腔种植修复,比较两组的临床疗效、治疗满意度。结果研究组的总有效率(93.32%)与对照组(80.00%)比较更高,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组满意度与对照组比较,固位能力、语言能力、咀嚼功能、牙齿舒适度评分更高,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论牙列缺损患者采用口腔种植修复效果显著,效果长期稳定,与常规固定修复比较优势明显。

Objective To compare the efficacy of oral implant repair and conventional fixation repair in the treatment of dentition defect. Methods The clinical data of 86 patients with dentition defect （90 teeth） treated in our hospital were selected from February to September 2016, all the patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table method. There were 43 cases（45 teeth） in each group, the control group was given conventional fixation repair, the study group was given oral implant repair, compared the two groups of clinical efficacy and treatment satisfaction. Results The total effective rate （93.32%） in the study group was higher than that in the control group （80.00%）, and there was significant difference between the two groups （P 〈 0.05）. The study group compared with the control group on the satisfaction rate, the retention capacity, language ability, chewing function and tooth comfort score were higher in the study group than in the control group, there were significant difference between two groups （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The results of oral implant repair have significant effect on the denture defect, and the effect is long and stable, which is obvious compared with the conventional fixation repair.