期刊文献+

利用改进的Loheide方法计算地下水的蒸散发量 被引量:5

Quantifying groundwater evapotranspiration by the modified loheide method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在干旱—半干旱地区,地下水的蒸散发是最重要的排泄方式之一,提高其计算精度对准确评价地下水资源具有重要意义。目前在已有的利用地下水水位的昼夜波动计算蒸散发的方法中,Loheide方法是计算精度最高并可以计算小时尺度的方法。针对该方法对水位去趋势化的不足,提出了新的潜水位去趋势的方法,即对3~5天的地下水位采用线性或三次多项式去趋势。采用数值模拟方法,对改进效果进行定量评估。结果表明,当相邻两天的水位变化较大时,提出的去趋势化方法使得蒸散发的计算精度有所提高,其中三次多项式去趋势化方法精度最高,比传统方法精度提高了16%,并且相对于Loheide利用1天数据线性去趋势化的方法,3~5天长序列去趋势能够提高去趋势处理的计算效率。 In arid and semi-arid regions,groundwater evapotranspiration is one of the main discharges,therefore the accurate estimation of evapotranspiration is significant to groundwater resources assessments. The Loheide method is currently the most accurate method to estimate hourly groundwater evapotranspiration using diurnal water table fluctuations. Aiming to improve the detrend procedure,the linear and cubic polynomial detrend method were proposed to detrend water table data over 3 ~ 5 days. The performance of the modification was assessed quantitatively using a model. The results indicate that the linear and cubic polynomial detrend method improve the estimation to some extent for the cases that water table varies dramatically. The best method is the cubic polynomial detrend method that increases the estimation by 16% in comparison to the original detrend method. Compared to the method which uses one-day water table data to get the detrend fluctuation,the modified method also is characterized by the enhancement of the detrend efficiency.
出处 《水文地质工程地质》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期48-51,共4页 Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41472228) 中国地质调查局项目(121201011000150020)
关键词 蒸散发 地下水 昼夜波动 Loheide 改进 evapotranspiration water table diurnal fluctuation Loheide modification
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献60

  • 1宋耀选,周茂先,张小由,肖洪浪.额济纳绿洲主要植物的水势与环境因子的关系[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(4):496-499. 被引量:45
  • 2乔平林,张继贤,王翠华,燕琴,刘正军.区域蒸散发量的遥感模型方法研究[J].测绘科学,2006,31(3):45-46. 被引量:10
  • 3王兴鹏,文卿琳,张维江.毛乌素沙地南缘赖草蒸腾速率与叶水势关系的初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):135-137. 被引量:5
  • 4段爱国,张建国,张俊佩,王军辉.金沙江干热河谷主要植被恢复树种叶水势的时空变化规律[J].林业科学研究,2007,20(2):151-159. 被引量:16
  • 5Scanlon B R, Healy R W, Cook P G.Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge [J]. Hydrogeol. J., 2002,10(1): 18-39.
  • 6Anon.Visual MODFLOW V. 4.0 User's Manual for Protesslonal Applications in Three -Dimensional Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport Modeling[M]. Ontario: Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc.. 2000:1-3.
  • 7Bauer P, Thabeng G, Stauffer F, et al. Estimation of the evapotranspiration rate from diurnal groundwater level fluctuations in the Okavango Delta, Botswana[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004,288(3/ 4): 344-355.
  • 8Brent D Newman, Bradford P Wilcox, Steven R Archer. Ecohydrology of water-limited environments: A scientific vision [J]. Water Resources Research, 2006, 42:W06302, doi:10.1029/ 2005WR004141.
  • 9Butler J J, Kluitenberg G J, Whittemore D O, et al. A field investigation of phreatophyte-induced fluctuations in the water table []]. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43: W02404, Doi: 10D1029/ 2005WR004627.
  • 10Gribovszki Z, Szilagyi J, Kalicz P. Diumal fluctuations in shallow groundwater levels and streamflow rates and their interpretation --A review[J]. Journal of Hydrology ,2010,385:371-383.

共引文献16

同被引文献57

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部