摘要
国际投资仲裁在解决投资者与东道国条约争端的各类方法中具有灵活性、自治性、高效性、中立性等优势。中国对外缔结的双边投资条约中对以国际仲裁方式解决投资争端的接受程度大大增加,这俨然有助于中国企业走出去以及外国投资引进来。中国内地仲裁机构众多,但均未受理过外国投资者与东道国仲裁,这不仅由于立法原因,也与政府层面的国际合作有关。2016年修订的最新版《深圳国际仲裁院仲裁规则》独树一帜,规定本机构可受理投资者诉东道国仲裁案件,但相关的制度性架构却并未建立起来,因此其实效性尚待实践检验。
International investment arbitration has the advantages of flexibility, autonomy, efficiency and neutral in resolving investor - state disputes. In the treaties China signed with other countries, we increasingly broaden the scope to accept the international arbitration, which is obviously helpful for Chinese enterprise go abroad and attracting foreign investment. China has more than 250 arbitration institutions, but all of these institution have delt with international investment treaty - based arbitration. The reasons not only consist in the legislative accounts, but also relate to governmental international collaboration. In the latest 2016 revision of SCIA arbitration rules, they made much more innovations, stipulate SCIA can accept investment treaty arbitration cases, but the relevant institutions have not been created, so its feasibility is still to be examined by practices.
出处
《南阳理工学院学报》
2017年第1期26-30,共5页
Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology
基金
国家留学基金委(留金发[2016]3100号)联合培养博士生项目(201607070108)
关键词
投资仲裁
双边投资协定
仲裁规则
仲裁法
investment arbitration
bilateral investment treaty
arbitration rules
arbitration law