期刊文献+

依赖结构对信任行为的影响:基于互依理论的视角 被引量:2

The Influence of Dependence Structure on Trust:Based on Interdependence Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信任是人际互动中的重要主题,受到诸多因素的影响,越来越多的研究者关注情境特征对信任的影响。以相互依赖理论为基础,操作依赖的相互性、依赖水平和利益协同,构建互动双方间不同的依赖结构,分析不同依赖结构对被试信任的影响。结果表明:(1)在双向依赖情境中被试的信任水平显著高于单向依赖情境;(2)单向依赖、低利益协同情境中,依赖水平对个体的信任行为有显著影响,双向依赖、高利益协同情境中,依赖水平对个体信任行为的影响不显著;(3)单向依赖、低依赖水平情境中,利益协同对信任行为有显著影响,双向依赖、高利益协同情境中,利益协同对信任行为影响不显著。 Trust is an important topic in human interactions, it simplifies decision process and helps cost cutting. Based on the situational theory,more and more researchers pay attention to situational factors trying to explain how people make decision before they are familiar. Based on Interdependence theory, the writer focused on how interpersonal interdependence structure effects trust decision. After carefully analysis ,they had several results. First, mutual dependence was important when people weren't familiar. Level of trust decline significantly when mutual dependence ended. Second,level of interdependence made subjects close together. In the situation of unidirectional depondence,the level of trust was higher in high level dependence,but it couldn't stop subjects' opportunism behavior. Third, covarianee of interest bounded subjects together even the dilemma situation was still. High covariance of interest made subjects trust more, but they would take opportunism behavior when the mutual dependence ended.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期178-184,共7页 Psychological Exploration
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY16G030021)
关键词 信任 相互依赖理论 依赖水平 依赖相互性 利益协同 trust interdependence theory level of interdependence mutuality of interdependence covariance of interdependence
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献48

  • 1Arneson R J. (1982). The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems. Ethics ,92 (4) ,616- 633.
  • 2Arnstein F,Feigenbaum K D. (1967). Relationship of three motives to choice in the prisoner' s dilemma. Psychological Reports, 20 ( 3 ) , 751- 755.
  • 3Combs J G, Ketchen D J ,Jr. (1999). Explaining Interfirm Cooperation and Performance:Toward a Reconciliation of Predictions from the ResourceBased View and Organizational Economics. Strategic Management Journal,20(9) ,867 - 888.
  • 4Dovidio J F, Gaertner S L, John M-S, Halabi S, Saguy T, Pearson A R, et al. (2008). Majority and minority perspectives in intergroup relations : The role of contact, group representations, threat, and trust in intergroup conflict and reconciliation. In : Nadler A, Malloy T E, Fisher J D, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation. 227 - 253.
  • 5Dreu,C. K. W. D. ,& McCusker, C. (1997). Gain-Loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 ( 5 ), 1093 - 1106.
  • 6Engle-Warniek J, Slonim R L. (2004). The evolution of strategies in a repeated trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4) .553 -573.
  • 7Gachter S, Herrrnann B, Thoni C. (2004). Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: Survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4),505-531.
  • 8Kelly H H, Thibaut J W. (1978). Interpersonal Relations. New York : Wiley.
  • 9Kuhlman D M, Marshello A. ( 1975 ). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner' s dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32,922 - 931.
  • 10Poppe M, Valkenberg H. (2003). Effects of gain versus loss and certain versus probable outcomes on social value orientations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33 ( 3 ) , 331 - 337.

共引文献3

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部