摘要
BACKGROUND: The treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer(BRPHC) is still controversial and challenging. The artery-first approaches are described to be the important options for the early determination. Whether these approaches can achieve an increase R0 rate, better bleeding control and increasing long-term survival for BRPHC are still controversial. We compared a previously reported technique, a modified artery-first approach(MAFA), with conventional techniques for the surgical treatment of BRPHC.METHODS: A total of 117 patients with BRPHC undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD) from January 2013 to June 2015 were included. They were divided into an MAFA group(n=78) and a conventional-technique group(n=39). Background characteristics, operative data and complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS: Mean operation time was significantly shorter in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group(313 vs 384 min; P=0.014); mean volume of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group(534 vs 756 m L; P=0.043); and mean rate of venous resection was significantly higher in the conventional-technique group than that in the MAFA group(61.5% vs 35.9%; P=0.014). Pathologic data, early mortality and morbidity were not different significantly between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS: MAFA is safe, simple, less time-consuming, less intraoperative blood loss and less venous resection, and therefore, may become a standard surgical approach to PD for BRPHC with the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein involvement but without superior mesenteric artery invasion.
BACKGROUND: The treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer(BRPHC) is still controversial and challenging. The artery-first approaches are described to be the important options for the early determination. Whether these approaches can achieve an increase R0 rate, better bleeding control and increasing long-term survival for BRPHC are still controversial. We compared a previously reported technique, a modified artery-first approach(MAFA), with conventional techniques for the surgical treatment of BRPHC.METHODS: A total of 117 patients with BRPHC undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD) from January 2013 to June 2015 were included. They were divided into an MAFA group(n=78) and a conventional-technique group(n=39). Background characteristics, operative data and complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS: Mean operation time was significantly shorter in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group(313 vs 384 min; P=0.014); mean volume of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the MAFA group than that in the conventional-technique group(534 vs 756 m L; P=0.043); and mean rate of venous resection was significantly higher in the conventional-technique group than that in the MAFA group(61.5% vs 35.9%; P=0.014). Pathologic data, early mortality and morbidity were not different significantly between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS: MAFA is safe, simple, less time-consuming, less intraoperative blood loss and less venous resection, and therefore, may become a standard surgical approach to PD for BRPHC with the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein involvement but without superior mesenteric artery invasion.
基金
supported by grants from The National Natural Science Foundation of China(81071775,81272659,81101621,81172064,81001068 and 81272425)
Key Projects of Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2011CDA030)
Research Fund of Young Scholars for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China(20110142120014)