期刊文献+

胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常的治疗效果 被引量:4

Therapeutic effect of amiodarone and lidocaine on patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular arrhythmia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析胺碘酮与利多卡因治疗急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常的临床治疗效果。方法:急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常患者98例,随机分为观察组和对照组,各49例。观察组患者给予胺碘酮治疗,对照组则给予利多卡因治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效、心率恢复时间、胸痛症状消失时间、治疗前后24 h动态心电图期前收缩次数及不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患者的临床治疗总有效率(93.88%)高于对照组(81.63%)(P<0.05)。观察组患者的心率恢复时间和胸痛症状消失时间均短于对照组,治疗后24 h动态心电图期前收缩次数低于对照组,不良反应发生率也低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常的临床效果较利多卡因好,可减少临床症状消失时间,不良反应少,值得推广应用。 Objective :To analyze the clinical effect of amiodarone and lidocaine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular arrhythmia. Methods:98 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular arrhythmia were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 49 cases in each group. Patients in the experimental group were treated with amiodarone and the control group received lidocaine. The clinical curative effect, the recovery time of heart rate, the disappearance time of symptom of chest pain, the number of contraction of dynamic electrocardiogram (ECG) 24 h before and after treatment and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results:The total effective rate (93.88 % ) of the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (81.63 % ), ( P 〈0.05 ). The recovery time of heart rate and the disappearance time of symptoms of chest pain in the experimental group were shorter than those in the control group( P 〈0.05 ). The number of contraction of dynamic ECG was lower than that of the control group at 24 h after treatment( P 〈 0.05 ). The incidence of adverse reactions was also lower than that of the control group, the differences statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Con- clusion:Amiodarone has better clinical effect than lidocaine in treating acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular arrhythmia. It can reduce the time of disappearance of clinical symptoms with less adverse reactions, which is worthy of popularization and application.
出处 《包头医学院学报》 CAS 2017年第4期11-13,共3页 Journal of Baotou Medical College
关键词 胺碘酮 利多卡因 急性心肌梗死 室性心律失常 Amiodarone Lidocaine Acute myocardial infarction Ventricular arrhythmia
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1殷实,黄亚辉,公兰兰.倍他乐克联合胺碘酮、门冬氨酸钾镁对急性心肌梗塞早期并发室颤的救治[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2007,16(2):168-169. 被引量:11
  • 2颜光美.药理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:262-266.
  • 3高长昀,江毅,肖骏,胡有志.胺碘酮与利多卡因对急性心肌梗死并室性心律失常的疗效比较[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2007,36(4):542-543. 被引量:30
  • 4Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW,et al.ACC/AHA guidlines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction-executive summary[J]. Circulation,2004,110:588
  • 5Hammill SC.Cardiac arrhythmias[J].JACC,2004,44(suppl 2):16A
  • 6Goldschlager N, Epstein AE, Naccarelli G, et al. Practical guidelines for clinicians who treat patients with amiodarone. Practice Guidelines Subcommittee, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology[J]. Arch Intern Med,2000,160:1 741
  • 7The American Heart Association in Collaboration with the International Liais on Committee on Resuscitation. Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 6: Advance cardiovascular life support. Section 5: Phamacology I: Agents for Arrhythmias[J]. Circulation, 2000, 102(Suppl 8): I 112
  • 8Fuster V, Rydén LE, Asinger RW, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Eur Heart J,2001,22:1 852
  • 9Khan IA.Pharmacological cardioversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation[J]. Eur Heart J ,2004,25:1 274
  • 10Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, et al. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002,347:1 825

共引文献407

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部