期刊文献+

系统化预检分诊模式与传统预检分诊模式对儿科急诊分诊的影响 被引量:17

Effects of systematic pre-examination triage and traditional pre-examination triageon pediatric emergency triage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨系统化预检分诊模式与传统预检分诊模式对儿科急诊分诊的影响。方法:选择儿科急诊收治的患儿400例,其中采用传统预检模式的患儿200例作为对照组,采用系统化预检分诊模式分诊的患儿200例作为观察组。对比两组患儿抢救结果和家属满意度。结果:观察组分诊准确率高于对照组(χ~2=9.835,P=0.002),观察组抢救成功率高于对照组,两组患儿死亡率、无纠纷和候诊意外发生比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组家属总满意比例高于对照组(χ~2=9.828,P=0.002)。结论:系统化预检分诊模式应用于儿科急诊分诊,提高了分诊准确率和患儿家属的满意度,具有较高临床应用价值。 Objective :To explore the effects of systemic pre - examination triage and traditional pre - examination triage on pediatric emergency triage. Methods: 400 cases of children admitted to Pediatric Emergency Department were selected, 200 cases with traditional pre -examination triage as the control group and 200 cases with systemic pre - examination triage as the observation group. The rescue results and family satisfaction of the two groups were compared. Results: The accuracy rate of rescue in the observation group was higher than that of the control group( X^2 =9. 835, P --0. 002). The rescue success rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the mortality, dispute and waiting accident in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant( P 〉0.05). The total satisfaction rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group ( x^2 = 9. 828, P = 0. 002). Conclusion: The systematic pre - examination triage ap- plied in pediatric emergency triage can improve the accuracy of triage and the satisfaction rate of the family members , thus having application value.
出处 《包头医学院学报》 CAS 2017年第4期30-31,共2页 Journal of Baotou Medical College
关键词 系统化预检分诊 传统预检分诊 儿科急诊分诊 Systematic pre - examination triage Traditional pre - examination triage Pediatric emergency triage
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1葛建一,程峰,康小明,贾佳.论医疗纠纷反应链[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(6):406-408. 被引量:21
  • 2高爱萍,李璧如.运用仿真模拟急救演习提高护士急救能力[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2006,21(8):46-47. 被引量:57
  • 3李明凤,王晓红,廖雪华.急诊预检分诊流程再造与分诊质量[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(13):2518-2519. 被引量:28
  • 4Kennedy J,Rhodes K, Walls C A, et al. Access to e-mergency care: restricted by long waiting times and costand coverage concerns [J]. Ann Emerg Med,2004,43(5)-567-573.
  • 5Tibballs J, Kinney S, Duke T, et al.Reduction ofpaediatric in-patient cardiac arrest and death with amedical emergency team: preliminary results.Arch DisChild,2005,90(11):1148-1152.
  • 6杨宝燕,王晓燕,徐洁,等.急诊预检分诊工作的现状与展望.解放军护理杂志,2007,6(8):519-521.
  • 7Kennedy J, Rhodes K, Walls CA, et al.Access toemergency care: restricted by long waiting times andcost and coverage concerns. Ann Emerg Med, 2004,43(5): 567-573.
  • 8Thompson T, Stanford K, Dick R, et al.Triageassessment in pediatric emergency departments: anational survey. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2010, 26(8):544-548.
  • 9钱素云.儿科急诊特殊病例的风险防范.第17届世界灾难与急救医学学术会议暨第14次全国急诊医学学术年会论文汇编,2011.
  • 10Pegalis SE,Bal BS .Closed medical negligenceclaims can drive patient safety and reduce litigation.Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012,470(5):1398-1404.

共引文献73

同被引文献114

引证文献17

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部