期刊文献+

MicroScan WalkAway仪器对碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌检测能力的评价 被引量:2

Evaluation on the performance of MicroScan WalkAway in detecting carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价MicroScanWalkAway 96 Plus(MSW)全自动微生物分析仪在碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)鉴定与预警中的指导价值。方法同时用PCR法和MSW系统检测福建医科大学附属协和医院实验室保存的81株CRE。以纸片扩散法和PCR法为金标准,比较该分析仪器对CRE菌株鉴定及预测是否产碳青霉烯酶的可靠性。结果 MSW判定CRE的符合率为69.1%(56/81)。PCR检测有48株细菌携带碳青霉烯类耐药基因;仪器法检测这些菌株时,高级专家系统(AES)预测产碳青霉烯酶的灵敏度为93.8%,特异度为42.4%,阳性预测值为70.3%,阴性预测值为82.4%,准确度为72.8%。结论 MSW系统对CRE具有较强的检测能力。 Objective To investigate the performance of MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus (MSW) system in detection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Methods A total of 81 stock CRE strains were used in this study. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test were performed by MSW system. Beta-lactamases genes blaKPC, blaIMP blaVIM, blaoOXA-48 and blaNDM were amplified by PCR and subjected to sequencing analysis. Disk diffusion method and PCR were used as gold standard to evaluate the performance and reliability of MSW system in identifying carbapenem-resistant and carbapenemase- producing Enterobacteriaceae. Results Overall, 69.1% (56/81) of the Enterobacteriaceae strains were identified as CRE by the MSW system. The results of PCR showed that 48 strains were carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. When carbapenemase- producing Enterobacteriaceae strains were identified by the instrument using an advanced expert system, the sensitivity was 93.8 % and specificity was 42.4%. The positive predictive value was 70.3 %, the negative predictive value was 82.4% and the predictive accuracy value was 72.8 %. Conclusions The MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus system has shown good performance in detection of CRE.
出处 《中国感染与化疗杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期42-45,共4页 Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
基金 国家自然科学基金(81201328) 福建省高校杰青项目(JA13134) 福建省卫计委中青年骨干人才培养项目(2015-ZQN-ZD-15)
关键词 MICROSCAN WalkAway 96 Plus仪器 碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科细菌 高级专家系统 MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus system carbapenem-resistant Enteroba'cteriaceae advanced expert system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1Trautmann M, Lepper PM,Schmitz FJ. Three cases of bacteria meningitis after spinal and epidural anesthesia [J]. Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,2002,21 (1):43-45.
  • 2Jevons MP. "Cellbenin"-resistant staphylococcus aureus [J]. Br Med, 1996,1: 124-125.
  • 3Hiramatsu K,Cui L, Kuroda M, et al. The emergence and evolution of methieillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus[J].Trends Microbiol, 2001,9(10):486.
  • 4Arhin FF,Sarmiento I,Moeck G, et al In vitro activities of orita- vancin and comparators against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates harbouring the novel mecC gene[J].Interna- tional Journal of Antimicrobial Agents,2014,44(1):65-68.
  • 5Louie L, Matsumura SO,Choi E, et al. Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methieillin resistance in Staphylococcus anreus[J].Clin Mierobiol,2000,38(6):2170-2173.
  • 6Lee JH. Methicillin (Oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential trans- mission to humans[J]. Appl Environ Mierobiol,2003,69(11):89-94.
  • 7Arias CA. Murray BE. Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century-a clinical super-challenge[J].N Engl J Med. 2009. 360(5): 439-443.
  • 8Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing[S]. Twentyfourth informational supplement. 2014. M100-S24 Vol 34 No. 1.
  • 9Hu F. Chen S. Xu X. et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates from a teaching hospital in Shanghai. China[J]. J Med Microbiol , 2012. 61 (Pr 1): 132- 136.
  • 10Brink AJ. Feldman C. Grolman DC. et al. Appropriate use of the carbapenems[J]. S Afr Med J. 2004. 94 (10 Pt 2): 857-861.

共引文献663

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部