摘要
伴随朝鲜时期三大论争的激烈展开,韩国对中国朱子学的继承与发展达到了空前的新高度。但随着社会的发展,朱子学的弊端日渐显现,注重经世治人的实学思想开始萌动,出现了实学思想的集大成者——茶山丁若镛(1762~1836年)。丁若镛强调"实用、实证",对建立在理气论基础上的朱子学进行了猛烈的批判,提出了独特的天道观、修养工夫论及中和论,构建起了自身的实学学术体系。比较丁若镛和朱熹关于以上三个方面的论述,忆古思今,对在追求文化多元化的今天探索儒学思想的当代价值具有重要意义。
Along with the heated Three Debates,the advancement of Zhuism(朱子学) ofjoseon Dynasty had showed an unprecedentedly high level of philosophical reasoning.However,as the society became increasingly developed,the drawback of Zhuism became more evident.Thus the idea of Silhak(实学,Practical Science) began to sprout,mainly focusing on statecraft,and there appeared Dasan Jeong Yak-Yong(1762-1836),who achieved the compilation of Silhak.Jeong Yak-Yong fiercely criticized Zhuxi(朱熹) who established the theory of Li(理) and Qi(气),heavily emphasizing on"practical demonstration".He presented unique theories in Cosmic Order of Heaven(天道),Self-cultivation(修养工夫),and Neutrality(中和),and built his own academic system of Silhak.This study compared Jeong Yak-Yong and Zhu Xi's theories based on these three categories mentioned above.This research has great significance in finding the contemporary value of Confucianism in this present age where we pursue cultural diversity.
出处
《韩国研究论丛》
CSSCI
2016年第1期151-167,共17页
Chinese Journal of Korean Studies
关键词
茶山实学
朱子学
天道观
慎独
中和论
Dasan Practical Science
Zhuism
Cosmic Order of Heaven(天道)
Self-cultivation(修养工夫/慎独)
Neutrality(中和)