期刊文献+

新型与传统溶血素在血常规检验中的应用对比 被引量:8

New Application Comparison with Traditional Hemolysin in Blood Inspection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比传统溶血素(B法)和新型溶血素(A法)在临床血常规检验中的结果。方法在同等条件下,分别采用A法和B法对同一血常规质控物的血小板、血红蛋白、红细胞和白细胞进行测定,测定次数为20次,对测定结果进行比较。结果 A法和B法测定的血红蛋白结果差异有统计学意义,P<0.05;红细胞、白细胞和血小板用A法和B法测定的结果差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。结论溶血素不同,血常规检测具有差异性。同一血常规质控物用不同的溶血素进行检测,必须保证测定结果具有可比性和结果互认,应当采用临床可接受的方法和评价进行比对。 Objective Traditional hemolysin (B method), and a new hemolysin (A method) results in clinicalblood test in comparison. Methods Under the same conditions, respectively A method and B method for quality control of blood platelet same substance, hemoglobin, red blood cells and white blood ceils was measured for 20 times the number of measurement results were compared. Results Difference between the results measured by hemoglobin A method and B method was statistically significant, P〈0.05; difference between the results, red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets using Method A and B Determination of no statistical significance, P〉0.05. Conclusion Hemolysin different blood test has a difference. The same blood quality control material with different hemolysin detected, must ensure that the measurement results are comparable and the mutual recognition of the results should be used clinically acceptable methods and evaluation for comparison.
出处 《中国医药指南》 2017年第9期10-11,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 临床检验 传统溶血素 新型溶血素 Clinical testing Traditional hemolysin New hemolysin
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献13

共引文献28

同被引文献38

引证文献8

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部