期刊文献+

FDG PET-CT对复发鼻咽癌疗效及预后评价研究 被引量:2

Value of FDG PET-CT in outcome assessment and prognostic evaluation for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价FDG PET-CT显像对复发鼻咽癌疗效监测及其预后评估价值.方法 2008-2013年经病理或影像学确诊的92例复发鼻咽癌,按中国2008鼻咽癌临床分期标准再分期.Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期分别为8、11、39、34例,其中复发T分期(rT1)、rT2、rT3、rT4期患者分别为10、11、38、33例.28例同时伴有颈淋巴结复发.所有患者均于疗前行全身或头颈部FDG PET-CT并接受放疗±化疗,分别分析SUVmax及临床各因素与临床预后关系.Kaplan-Meier法计算OS、DFS、LRFS、RRFS、DMFS,Logrank法检验和单因素预后分析,Cox模型多因素预后分析.结果 3年OS、DFS、LRFS、RRFS、DMFS分别为33.6%、32.1%、32.8%、31.8%、33.7%.肿瘤SUVmax中位数为8.35(2.70~21.50).与3年OS相关最佳截断点SUVmax为7.0,SUVmax≤7.0、>7.0患者3年OS分别为42.0%、28.3%(P=0.019).单因素分析显示年龄、SUVmax、rN分期与OS相关(P=0.023、0.019、0.002),多因素分析显示SUVmax和rN分期是OS、DFS、DMFS影响因素(HR=1.68,P=O.045和HR=2.23,P=0.003;HR=1.67,P=0.042和HR=2.39,P=0.001;HR=1.77,P=0.025和HR=2.40,P=0.001).结论 SUVmax可能是影响复发鼻咽癌OS、DFS、DMFS的有效预后因素. Objective To investigate the value of FDG PET-CT in the outcome assessment and prognostic evaluation for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC).Methods From January 2008 to December 2013,92 rNPC patients were treated in our center,who were histologically or radiologically diagnosed and re-staged according to the 2008 clinical staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.The numbers of patients in stage Ⅰ,stage Ⅱ,stage Ⅲ,and stage Ⅳ were 8,11,39,and 34,respectively.According to the recurrent T stage (rT),the numbers of patients in rT1,rT2,rT3,and rT4 were 10,11,38,and 33,respectively.Twenty-eight patients had recurrence in the neck lymph nodes.All patients underwent pretreatment FDG PET-CT for the whole body or head/neck,and treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.The relationship of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and clinical factors with clinical outcomes was analyzed.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS),disease-free survival (DFS),local recurrence-free survival (LRFS),regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS),and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).The log-rank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate prognostic analysis.The Cox model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis.Results The 3-year OS,DFS,LRFS,RRFS,and DMFS were 33.6%,32.1%,32.8%,31.8%,and 33.7%,respectively.The median SUVmax was 8.35 (2.7-21.5).The SUVmax of 7.0 was taken as the optimal cut-off value for all patients.Patients with SUVmax ≤7.0 had a significantly higher 3-year OS rate than those with SUVm ax >7.0 (42.0% vs.28.3%,P=0.019).The univariate analysis revealed that patient age,SUV and rN were significantly associated with OS (P=0.023,0.019,and 0.002).The multivariate analysis showed that SUVmax and rN were significant influencing factors for OS,DFS,and DMFS (HR=1.68,P=0.045 and HR=2.23,P=0.003;HR=1.67,P=0.042 and HR=2.39,P=0.001;HR=1.77,P=0.025 and HR=2.40,P=0.001).Conclusions SUVmax may be one of the useful prognostic factors for OS,DFS,and DMFS in rNPC patients.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期384-389,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 鼻咽肿瘤 复发 预后 Tomography,X-ray computed Nasopharyngeal neoplasms,recurrent Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献42

  • 1卢泰祥,赵充,吴少雄,罗伟,陈勇,谢方云,陈明,曾祥发,胡伟汉,曹新平,夏云飞,刘秀芳,崔念基.鼻咽癌单纯常规外照射放疗疗效的分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(10):620-622. 被引量:90
  • 2赵充,卢泰祥,韩非,卢丽霞,黄劭敏,邓小武,林承光,崔念基.139例鼻咽癌调强放疗的临床研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(1):1-6. 被引量:154
  • 3高黎,易俊林,黄晓东,李素艳,罗京伟,徐国镇.鼻咽癌根治性放疗10年经验总结[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(4):249-256. 被引量:144
  • 4陈春燕,卢泰祥,赵充,卢丽霞,韩非,孙颖.紫杉醇与调强放疗同期治疗鼻咽癌的耐受性试验[J].癌症,2007,26(4):398-402. 被引量:6
  • 5Kwong DL, Pow EH, Sham JS, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study on disease control and preservation of salivary function [J]. Cancer, 2004, 101 (7) : 1584-1593.
  • 6Lee N, Xia P, Quivey JM, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002,53( 1 ) : 12-22.
  • 7Kam MK, Teo PM, Chau RM, et al. Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004,60(5) : 1440-1450.
  • 8Lin SJ, Pan JJ, Han L, et al. Nsopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy: rdport on the 3-year outcome of a prospective series [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009,76( 1 ) : 1-8.
  • 9Radiation Theapy Oncology Group Protocol 02-25. Available at: http ://www.rtog.org/memebers/protocols/0225/0225.pdf. Accessed August 26, 2008.
  • 10Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1995,31 (5) : 1341-1346.

共引文献184

同被引文献18

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部