摘要
采用薄边界层法与在线测量-静态通量箱法对三峡库区水-气界面温室气体甲烷(CH_4)通量进行比较,得到两种估算方法差异性.结果显示:静态通量箱法结果多数点高于薄边界层法,一般为薄边界层法的1.2~12倍;极少数点薄边界层法高于静态通量箱法.
A comparison between the thin boundary layer method and online monitoring-static chamber method for estimating greenhouse gases（CH4） fluxes of methane across the water-air interface of the Three-Gorges Reservoir. The differences between the two methods are obtained. The results show that the static chamber method results in most points higher than ones by thin boundary layer method; generally, it is 1.2-12 times ones by thin boundary layer method.
出处
《三峡大学学报（自然科学版）》
CAS
2017年第2期39-42,共4页
Journal of China Three Gorges University：Natural Sciences
基金
国家自然科学基金(41273110)
湖北省自然科学基金(2014CFB672)
湖北省教育厅科研计划项目(Q20151209)
关键词
薄边界层法
静态通量箱法
温室气体通量
thin boundary layer method
static chamber method
flux of greenhouse gases
