摘要
目的:比较分析非接触式眼压计(NCT)、Icare回弹式眼压计(RBT)、Tono-pen眼压计(TPT)和Goldmann眼压计(GAT)的眼压测量结果,评价不同眼压计在临床的应用价值。方法:收集我院临床患者36例(72眼)分别用NCT、RBT、TPT和GAT眼压计测量眼压,然后根据GAT测得的眼压值分为3组,A组(眼压≤21 mmHg)、B组(21 mmHg<眼压≤30 mmHg)、C组(眼压>30 mmHg),对比分析不同眼压程度分组下各种眼压计的测量结果。结果:NCT-GAT平均差值在A组为(0.22±0.43)mm Hg(t=1.936,P=0.075),B组为(0.90±1.26)mm Hg(t=2.156,P=0.063),C组为(7.94±3.02)mm Hg(t=6.958,P=0.000);RBT-GAT平均差值在A组为(0.55±0.57)mm Hg(t=3.656,P=0.003),B组为(0.05±0.45)mm Hg(t=0.347,P=0.738),C组为(-0.53±1.71)mm Hg(t=-0.825,P=0.441);TPT-GAT平均差值在A组为(-0.66±0.99)mm Hg(t=-2.531,P=0.026),B组为(-0.50±0.62)mm Hg(t=-2.434,P=0.041),C组为(-2.25±2.67)mm Hg(t=-2.223,P=0.068)。结论:NCT、RBT均适用于在临床工作中青光眼的诊断,因眼压≤21 mmHg时,RBT测量的眼压值与GAT相比差异有统计学意义,故最好不用于青光眼随访,TPT仅适用于青光眼筛查。
Objective: To compare and analyze the intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured by non-contact tonometer (NCT) , Ieare rebound tonometer (RBT) , Tono-pen tonometer (TPT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) , and to evaluate the clinical application value of different tonometers in measuring IOP. Methods: IOP was measured by NCT, RBT, TPT and GAT tonometers in 36 patients (72 eyes) . The patients were divided into three groups according to IOP measured by GAT, group A (IOP≤21 mmHg), group B (21 mmHg〈IOP≤30 mmHg), group C (IOP〉30 mmHg) . Measurement results of different tonometers in different groups were compared and analyzed. Results: The average difference of NCT-GAT in group A was (0.22± 0.43) mmHg (t=1.936, P=0.075), (0.90±1.26) mmHg in group B (t=2.156, P=0.063), (7.94±3.02) mmHg in group C (t= 6.958, P=0.000) . The average difference of RBT-GAT in group A was (0.55±0.57) mmHg (t=3.656, P=0.003), (0.05±0.45) mmHg in group B (t=0.347, P=0.738), (-0.53±1.71) mmHg in group C (t=-0.825, P=0.441) . The average difference of TPT-GAT in group A was (-0.66±0.99) mmHg (t=-2.531, P=0.026), (-0.50+0.62) mmHg in group B (t=-2.434, P= 0.041) , (-2.25±2.67) mmHg in group C (t=-2.223, P=0.068) . Conclusions: Both NCT and RBT are suitable for the diagnosis of glaucoma in clinical practice. Because the measurement result with RBT is significantly different compared with GAT when IOP is ≤21 mmHg , it is not recommended for glaucoma follow-up. TPT is only suitable for glaucoma screening.
出处
《沈阳医学院学报》
2017年第2期100-102,105,共4页
Journal of Shenyang Medical College