期刊文献+

基因编辑技术CRISPR/Cas9专利的认定 被引量:2

Identification of the gene editing technology CRISPR/Cas9 patent
原文传递
导出
摘要 基因编辑技术CRISPR/Cas9自出现以来吸引了广泛关注。两个研究团队对此项技术在美国专利归属的争夺引起了关于此项技术是否可专利以及其专利归属的讨论。现通过分析美国的专利制度论证基因编辑技术CRISPR/Cas9的可专利性,并通过介绍美国专利制度中确定专利权人基本原则的转变,探求基因编辑技术CRISPR/Cas9专利的归属问题。最后,通过现有资料和专利制度的相关知识预测专利的最终归属,以及对如何应对基因编辑技术CRISPR/Cas9在我国的专利申请作出判断。 Since the gene editing technology CRISPR/Cas9 emerged, it has aroused widespread concern. The legal battle over the patent of this technology has caused discussions mainly on two questions: whether the gene editing technology CRISPR/Cas9 can be patented or not and who will be the patent owner. Through analyzing the U.S. patent system, this paper intends to prove that the gene editing technology CRISPRJCas9 satisfies the requirements of the patent eligible subject and explore the ownership of its patent by introducing the changeover of U.S. patent principles from first-to-invent to first-inventor-to-file. Finally, the paper predicts the final ownership of the patent in accordance with the existing evidence and relevant knowledge of the U.S. patent system, and also analyzes the potential result of the application for gene editing technology CRISPR/Cas9 patent in China.
出处 《生命科学》 CSCD 2017年第2期215-220,共6页 Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences
基金 国家科技重大专项(2016ZX08001001)
关键词 CRISPR/Cas9技术 专利客体 实质性条件 专利归属 gene editing technology CRISPR/Cas9 patent object substantial requirements ownership of patent
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献76

  • 1陈向东,张晨.在华制药领域专利技术资源竞争——美国制药企业专利资源竞争比较及其启示[J].中国软科学,2006(5):63-72. 被引量:17
  • 2祁志.打开基因技术专利之门的案例——对Diamond v.Chakrabarty案的剖析[J].医学与哲学(A),2006,27(6):51-52. 被引量:5
  • 3美国专利商标局官方网站,http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/20110916-pub-1112-29.pal.
  • 4Robert A. Armitage, "Understanding the America Invents Act and Its Implications for Patenting" , 40 AIPLA Q.J. 1, (2012).
  • 5David S. Almeling, "Seven Reasons Why Trade Secrets Are Increasingly Important" , 27 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 1091 ( 2012 ).
  • 6http://www.bitlaw.com/source/35usc-after-america-invents-act/index.html.
  • 7Toshiko Takenaka, "Has the United States Adopted a First-To-File System Through America Invents Act? A Comparative Law Analysis of Patent Priority under First-Inventor-To-File" , GRUR Int. 2012, Heft 4, p304, n3.
  • 8Martin J. Adlem, Randall R. Rad d John R. Thomas, Cases and Materials on Patent Law, 3rd ed., 2009.
  • 9Robert P. Merges and John F. Duffy, Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials, 5th ed., 2011.
  • 1035 U.S.C. § 102.

共引文献31

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部