期刊文献+

经腹及经阴道彩色多普勒超声对子宫疤痕妊娠的诊断价值研究 被引量:14

The diagnostic value research of cesarean scar pregnancy by trans-abdominal and transvaginal color doppler scanning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析经腹及经阴道彩色多普勒超声对子宫疤痕妊娠的诊断价值。方法:选取进行治疗的子宫疤痕患者41例,分别实施经腹及经阴道彩色多普勒超声检查,对比两种诊断方式的诊断结果及声像分型。结果:经阴道超声确诊率(95.1%)较经腹超声(78.1%)明显提高,差异显著有统计学意义(P<0.05);经阴道超声诊断单纯妊娠囊型19例,占48.7%;团块型15例,占38.5%;位于宫腔型5例,占12.8%;经腹超声诊断单纯妊娠囊型17例,占53.1%;团块型13例,占40.6%;位于宫腔型2例,占6.3%。两种诊断方式声像分型比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经阴道彩色多普勒超声可提高子宫疤痕妊娠确诊率,值得临床推广。 Objective To analyse the diagnostic value of cesarean scar pregnancy by trans-abdominal and transvaginal color doppler scanning.Method 41 cases of patients with cesarean scar pregnancy for treatment were selected,to respectively implemented the trans-abdominal and transvaginal color doppler scanning,to compare the diagnosis and ultrasound classification of two diagnostic modes.Results The diagnose rate of the transvaginal was 95.1%,that was significantly improved to compare with the 78.1% of the trans-abdominal,there was statistical significance( P ﹤ 0.05).After the endovaginal ultrasonic diagnosis,the mode as pure gestational sac was 19 cases,which was accounted for 48.7%.The mode as block mass was 15 cases,which was accounted for 38.5%.The mode as located the uterine cavity was 5 cases,which was accounted for 12.8%.After the abdominal ultrasound diagnosis,the mode as pure gestational sac was 17 cases,which was accounted for 53.1%.The mode as block mass was 13 cases,which was accounted for 40.6%.The mode as located the uterine cavity was 2 cases,which was accounted for 6.3%.To compare the ultrasound classification of two diagnostic modes,there was no statistical significance( P〈0.05).Conclusion The able to improve the diagnose rate of cesarean scar pregnancy by the transvaginal color doppler scanning,and that is worth for promotion in the clinical.
作者 吴新如
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2017年第4期612-613,共2页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 经腹 经阴道 彩色多普勒超声 子宫疤痕妊娠 诊断 Transabdominal Transvaginal Color doppler ultrasound Cesarean scar pregnancy Diagnose
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management [J]. Obstet Gyneeol, 2006, 107: 1373.
  • 2Einenkel J, Stumpp P, KosIing S, et al. A misdiagnosed case of caesau'en scar pregnancy [ J] . Arch Gyneco! Obstet, 2005, 271 (1): 178.
  • 3李玉林,唐建武.病理学[M].第6版,人民卫生出版社,2008:28.
  • 4Flystra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002,57 : 537-543.
  • 5Scow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004,23 : 247- 253.
  • 6Maymon R, Halperin R, Mendlovic S, et al. Ectopic pregnancies in a Caesarean scar: review of the medical approach to an iatrogenic complication. Hum Reprod Update, 2004,10: 515-523.
  • 7Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies : etiology, diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol, 2006,107: 1373-1381.
  • 8Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril, 1997,67 : 398-400.
  • 9Ko Hs, Lee Y, Lee HJ, et al. Sonographic and MR findings in 2 cases of intramural pregnancy treated conservatively. J Clin Ultra, 2006,34 : 356-360.
  • 10Weimin W, Wenqing L. Effect of early pregnancy on a previous lower segment cesarean section scar. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002, 77 : 201-207.

共引文献188

同被引文献90

引证文献14

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部