期刊文献+

瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘剖宫产不同麻醉方式的临床探讨 被引量:5

The clinical exploration of scar uterus merger of placenta previa indifferent anesthesia models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘剖宫产不同麻醉方式的临床疗效。方法选取我院产科2014年6月—2016年7月接收的60例瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘产妇作为研究对象,均采取剖宫产术,按照麻醉方式不同分为硬膜外麻醉组(40例)和全身麻醉组(20例)。比较2组患者的麻醉效果。结果 2组失血性休克、子宫切除率、失血量、升压药应用等存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论瘢痕子宫妊娠合并前置胎盘剖宫产术患者术前需根据实际情况选择麻醉方式,以减少母婴并发症,确保麻醉安全。 Objective Researching the scar uterus merger of placenta previa indifferent anesthesia models. Methods The hospital maternity is selecting from June 2014 to July 2014,receive the 60 cases of merger of scar uterus placenta previa maternal as the research object, to break the palace to produce is adopted, according to different divided into epidural anesthesia group (40 cases) and general anesthesia group (20 cases ).Then compared two groups of patients with medical curative effect of different anesthesia methods. Results Two groups of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, uterus resection rate blood loss,vasopressors applications vary,with statistical significance (P〈0.05).Conclusion For scar pregnancy with uterine placenta previa cesarean section,preoperative anesthesia should be according to the actual circumstance of patients choosing to reduce the maternal complications and guarantee the safety of anesthesia.
作者 彭有圣 吴云 刘萍 何彩云 唐国莲 游小辉 Peng Yousheng Wu Yun Liu Ping et al(The Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jingdezhen City,Jingdezhen, Jiangxi 33300)
出处 《基层医学论坛》 2017年第5期513-514,共2页 The Medical Forum
基金 景德镇市科技计划项目(20162SFZC081)
关键词 瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘 剖宫产 硬膜外麻醉 全身麻醉 Scar uterus placenta previa Caesarean section Epidural anesthesia General anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1Liu YJ, Li GH, Chen Y, et al. A descriptive analysis of the indications for aesarean section in China's Mainland. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2014, 14:410-418.
  • 2Gupta A, Aneja A, Bahl N, et al. Save the uterus. J Fetal Med, 2014, 4(1) :181-185.
  • 3Aggarwal R, Suneja A, Vaid NB, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: a critical review. J Obstet Gynecol India, 2012, 62 (1) : 57-61.
  • 4Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gyneeol, 2006,107 (6) : 1226-1232.
  • 5Claeys J, Hellendoorn I, Hamerlynck T, et al. The risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy, a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Gynecol Surg, 2014, 11: 197-206.
  • 6Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Risk of pla- centa previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a populationbased study and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2011, 11 (1) :95.
  • 7Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol, 2002,99 (6) : 976-980.
  • 8Gayat E, Resche-Rigon M, Morel O, et al. Predictive factors of advanced interventional procedures in a multicentre severe postpartum haemorrhage study. Intensive Care Med, 2011, 37(11) : 1816-1825.
  • 9Hong JY, Jee YS, Yoon HJ, et al. Comparison of general and epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section for placen- ta previa totalis: maternal hemodynamics, blood loss and neonatal outcome. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2003, 12(1) : 12-16.
  • 10赵野,崔薇,赵彤.中央型前置胎盘剖宫产时宫腔填纱止血方法的探讨[J].中国妇幼保健,2008,23(19):2764-2765. 被引量:26

共引文献36

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部