论经济分析意见及其可采性规则--以反垄断诉讼为视域

On the Economic Analysis Opinion and Its Admissible Rules: In the Sight of Antitrust Litigation

经济分析意见在反垄断诉讼中的涌现体现了技术权不断扩大的趋势。同时,反垄断法独特的知识构造也为经济分析意见提供了适用空间。当然,考察我国制度现实,经济分析意见尚无明确的证据法定位,相应的证据规则尚付阙如,这难免造成反垄断讼争中技术权与审判权的抵牾。而考察经济分析意见在域外证据法上的历史演进,专家证据制度应当作为适当归宿,为经济分析意见的规范化提供规则基础。在此基础上,还应当构建经济分析意见的可采性规则,为法官采证提供科学的标准。具体而言,经济分析意见的采证应当坚持专家适格规则、可靠性规则以及相关性规则。

The existence of economic analysis opinion in antitrust litigation reflects the growing trend of technology right. Meanwhile,the unique knowledge structure of anti-monopoly law also provides suitable space for economic analysis opinion. Of course,through examining the reality of our system,there is no clear positioning of economic analysis opinion in evidence law,the corresponding rules of evidence is still a blank field,which will inevitably result in contradiction between antitrust litigation in technology right and jurisdiction. Through examining the evolution of economic analysis opinion on extraterritorial law of evidence,expert evidence as an appropriate law system can provide a basis for rules of economic analysis opinions. On this basis,we should establish the rules of admissibility on economic analysis opinion,it will provide a scientific standard for judges collecting evidence. Concretely speaking,the rules of admissibility economic analysis opinion includes the experts eligibility rules,the reliable rules,and the relevant rules.