摘要
面对刑法规范供给的不足,刑法解释需要重视利益分析及其基础上的目的解释方法。刑法解释不是认知教义学上的理解,而是表达意义上的论证,利益法学与目的解释之间具有学术上的内在关联,后者是前者在解释论上的延伸。目的解释的内在危险不在目的解释本身,而在解释者解释的过程缺乏利益判断的类型化思维。利益法学立场下的刑法目的解释适用需要妥善处理案件事实对刑法规范的型构意义,目的解释与国民预测可能性的关系以及利益类型化的判断。强调利益分析接受构成要件类型化的限定,是目的解释应当坚持的基本准则。
In the face of insufficient supply of criminal law,the interpretation of the criminal law needs to pay attention to the interests of the analysis and the basis of the purpose of interpretation. Interpretation of criminal law is not a cognitive interpretation of the doctrine,but the expression of the meaning of the argument,the interests of the law and the purpose of the interpretation of the internal relationship between the academic,the latter is an extension of the interpretation of the theory. The purpose of interpretation of the internal risk is not the purpose of interpretation itself,but in the process of the interpretation of the lack of interest in the interpretation of the type of thinking. The purpose of the criminal law in the interests of law interpretation is applicable to the need to properly handle the case facts to the criminal code of the constitutive significance,the purpose of interpretation and the possibility of national prediction and the relationship between the interests of the type of judgment. The limitation of the type of constitutive requirement of the interest analysis is emphasized,which is the basic principle to be persisted.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期65-73,共9页
Legal Forum
基金
国家社科基金项目"刑法社会化研究"(11BFX109)的阶段性成果
关键词
利益法学
目的解释
实质解释
构成要件类型化
the interests of law
the purpose of interpretation
substantive interpretation
constitutive requirements
typifies