摘要
最高人民法院将"两金"排除出赔偿范围的原则及理由均有待商榷。以加害人有无赔偿能力作为是否赔偿"两金"的适用原则,有悖宪法平等原则。"两金"系物质损失而非精神损失,排除"两金"既无助于降低空判,也不利于附带民事调解的达成,更不符合法律位阶原则的适用。赔偿"两金"既体现了对生命权、健康权的尊重,也有助于强化权利救济和维护司法权威,并符合我国的历史传统。由此,建议将"两金"重新纳入刑事附带民事赔偿范围。
The Supreme Court will compensation for death and disability compensation ruled out criminal incidental civil compensation scope is questionable. To the offenders have compensation ability as the basis of whether the compensation for damages compensation for death and disability,in violation of the constitutional principle of equality. The compensation for death and disability compensation is material loss,eliminate the execution of death and disability compensation damages against the referee,is unfavorable to reach conciliation,more do not conform to the legal status of the principle. Compensation will be death and disability compensation to criminal incidental civil compensation range,both embodies the respect for the right to life,the right to health,can also help strengthen the right remedy and safeguard judicial authority,and conforms to our country tradition.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期120-126,共7页
Legal Forum
基金
中国法理学研究会青年专项课题"刑事被害人及其近亲属的人权司法保障问题研究"(2015@FL002)的阶段性成果
关键词
死亡赔偿金
残疾赔偿金
刑事附带民事诉讼
刑事被害人
权利保障
death compensation
disability compensation
civil suit collateral to criminal proceedings
criminal victim
rights protection