从文献大数据看近十年我国哲学社会科学学术发展状况(2006—2015)

The Academic Development of Philosophy and Social Sciences in China over the Last Decade Based on the Big Data of Literature(2006-2015)

在CNKI 2006—2015年6268种学术期刊700多万篇文献大数据的基础上,以CNKI《知识资源总库》为统计数据源,运用文献计量学和对比分析方法,从发展趋势、学科现状、机构统计、学者分析、研究热点和高影响力文献等角度,定量分析了我国哲学社会科学及主要学科领域在统计年的各项评价指标和数据。统计发现,近10年来我国哲学社会科学学术产出总体呈现上升趋稳状态,研究水平不断提高。其中,经济学和教育学的研究规模最大,管理学、马克思主义、心理学、军事学、考古学、宗教学等学科产出较低。高等院校是当前我国哲学社会科学学术研究的主要阵地,社科院和科研机构发文的总体篇均质量相对较好。我国哲学社会科学工作者数量也呈上升趋稳状态,但90%以上在近10年发表的论文数不超过5篇。论文高频关键词有助于准确分析该领域的主要研究方向和研究重点,而高被引和高下载等高影响力论文则能揭示出同行研究和读者关注的具体问题。这些数据及分析为党和政府的顶层设计、科研管理者的学科布局、学术机构的发展规划、学者的研究方向以及期刊的组稿审稿等哲学社会科学的学术创新与发展,提供了基于大数据的分析方法和科学决策参考依据。

Based on more than 7 million articles from 6268 academic journals in CNKI from 2006to2015,and CNKI China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database as the statistical data source,and using bibliometrics and comparative analysis methods,we have quantitatively analyzed the evaluation indexes and data on the philosophy and social sciences and other major subjects in China in the statistical years from different dimensions,such as development trends,current situation of disciplines,institutional statistics,scholar analysis,research hotspots and influential literatures.Our findings show that,in the last decade,the overall academic output of philosophy and social sciences has increased and is now keeping steady progress,and the research level has improved greatly.Among them,the scales of economics and pedagogy are the largest,while management science,Marxism,psychology,military science,archeology,religious studies have less output.Institutions of higher learning are the mainstay of academic research on philosophy and social sciences in China at present.The overall quality of the articles from academies of social sciences and other scientific research institutions is relatively better.The number of researchers has stabilized after increasing,but more that 90 percent of them have published fewer than five papers in the past 10 years.This big-data-based analytical methods and findings provide a valuable reference for the Party and government in making top design for the academic innovation and development of philosophy and social sciences;for managers of academic research in making decisions;for academic institutions in making development plan;for scholars in choosing research directions;and for academic journals in their paper solicitation and publication.