3Schubert A, Braun T. Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36(3) : 311 -324.
4Schubert A, Braun T. Reference standards for citation based assessments[J]. Scientometrics, 1993, 26(1) : 21 -35.
5Schubert A, Braun T. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact [J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(5) : 281 -291.
6Vinkler P. Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36 (2) : 223 - 236.
7Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications[ J ]. Scientometrics, 1986, 10 (3) : 157 - 177.
8Glanzel W, Thijs B, Schubert A, et al. Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance [ J ]. Scientometries, 2009, 78 (1): 165-188.
9van Raan A F J. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments [ J ]. Assessment Theory and Practice, 2003, 1(12) : 20-29.
10Seglen P O. The skewness of science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, 43 (9) : 628 - 638.
