期刊文献+

基于地形因子的土壤有机碳最优估算模型 被引量:13

Optimal Estimation Model of Soil Organic Carbon Based on the Terrain Factor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于数字地面模型(Digital Terrain Model,DTM),同时考虑因子组合和分辨率构建土壤有机碳(SOC)最优估算模型。在7 100 km2范围内,选取了71个分辨率和22个地形因子中不多于5个因子的所有可能组合,构造了2 514 820个模型。采样点随机分为两组,6 362个训练样点构造数据挖掘模型,其他2 208个为验证样点。根据模型相关系数r值大小从中选取了不同个数因子组合以及相应分辨率的最优模型,并根据这些模型生成对应的土壤有机碳图。结果表明:单个地形因子模型和栅格大小之间的关系表现出多样化,并不是分辨率越高模型结果越好。单因子模型r值的大小并不能决定其在因子组合模型中的重要性。不同的因子及其组合有其特定的最适分辨率,最佳分辨率范围约为60~150 m。综合数据的存储空间和计算量、模型复杂度、预测精度以及空间表达能力,该地区最优模型由相对坡位、高程、归一化高程及多尺度山谷平坦指数等4个变量组成,对应分辨率为121.6 m。同时与多种克里格空间插值方法生成的土壤有机碳空间分布图进行了对比分析,发现无论几个变量的组合,其空间预测能力均较克里格空间插值方法更能表达SOC的空间变化,预测精度也较高。 【Objective】As an important component of the global carbon pool,soil organic carbon(SOC)is the largest organic carbon pool in the terrestrial ecosystem and plays an extremely important role in the global carbon cycle and global warming.The SOC pool is subject to the impacts of both natural and human activities and sure closely related to terrain attributes or factors.There are a number of methodsfor calculation of SOC,which can roughly be sorted into three types,that is,empirical,statistical and mechanismones.But none of them can be used to predict or calculate reapidly soil organic carbon pool of a region rapidly.Remote sensing is an efficient technical means for fast acquisition of DTM,from which numerous information can be derived with the aid of GIS,thus making it possible to constitute a model for rapid calculation of SOC.【Method】Based on the Digital Terrain Model(DTM)and the topographic attributesderived thereof,an optimal SOC prediction model was built up,taking into account factor combination and resolution with Cubist,a powerful data mining tool for generating rule-based models.This tool works on conditionspecific rules where the output is a set of rules and each rule has a specific multivariate linear model attached.Whenever a situation matches the condition of a rule,the associated model is used to calculate or predictevalues.A total of 8 570 soil samplescollected from the 7 100 km2 study area were divided into two groups randomly,6 362 for training and the other 2 208 for model validation,a total of 2 514 820 models were constructed based on 71 selected resolutions and all possible combinations of no more than 5of the 22 terrains attributes.According to the correlation coefficient(R),terrain factors,varying in number,were selected,to form optimal models with their corresponding resolutions,Based on these models,SOC maps were plotted.【Result】Results show that the relationsships between resolution and single-factor models are diversified,it is not true that the higher the resolution,the better the model.The R value of a single-factor model is not necessarily the factor that determines its importance in a multi-factor model.All the multi-factor modelsexhibit a similar rule of skewed normal distribution.Each factor and its combination has a factorspecific optimal resolution,varying in the range of 60~150 m.For models composed of whatever factors,the resolution t be selected should not be lower than 200 m.The variable of the optimal single-factor model is RSP,with resolution being 92.8 m,the variables of the optimal two-factor model are RSP and Chnl_base with resolution being 60.8 m,while the variables of the three-factor model are Chnl_alti,Chnl_base and MRVBF,with resolution being 64 m.There are 6 four-factor models,with R being 0.71 and resolution varying in the range of 64 ~ 136 m,and 2 five-factor models with R being 0.78,and resolution being 152 meters.Every model consists at least of Chnl_alti,elevation,Chnl_base and MRRTF,and in the 2 five-factor models Normalh or Midslppst is added.The R of all the models consisting of any four ro five of the 22 factors was calculated to be 0.78 with two optimal resolutions,i.e.40 and 64 m.In general,the more the variables,the higher the R of the models.But owing to impact of the noise,models with more than four factors decine in predictive ability.Four to five is the appropriate number of factors in combination,making the models more capable of predicting SOC.Comparative analysis of the SOC maps plotted with the aid of global fan Kriging,global ordinary Kriging,global kriging and ordinary Kriging shows that regardless of the number of factors in the model,this method is better than all the four Kriging interpolation methods in prediction of spatial variation of SOC and prediction accuracy.【Conclusion】Takinginto comprehensive account storage space,amount of calculationm,sophistication of the model,accuracy of prediction and ability of spatial expression,the optimal model for the study region should be the four-factor model,consisting of relative slope position,elevation,normalheight and MRVBF,with resolution being 121.6 m.
出处 《土壤学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第2期331-343,共13页 Acta Pedologica Sinica
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2015B070701017 2014A040401059 2015A030401068) 国家自然科学基金项目(41601558) 广东省科学院创新平台建设专项资助~~
关键词 土壤有机碳 数字土壤制图 数据挖掘 最优估算模型 数字地面模型 地形参数 Soil organic carbon(SOC) Digital soil mapping Data mining Digital Terrain Model(DTM) Terrain attribute Optimal model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献66

共引文献674

同被引文献248

引证文献13

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部