期刊文献+

胎儿颅脑超声筛查与中枢神经超声学检查同MRI的一致性 被引量:21

Consistency of fetal brain ultrasound screening and neurosonogram with MRI
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究胎儿颅脑超声筛查与中枢神经超声学(neurosonogram,NSG)检查同MRI的一致性,探讨2种超声检查方法在胎儿神经系统发育异常诊断中的临床价值及NSG检查在胎儿颅脑畸形诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2015年7月问在北京大学第一医院进行颅脑超声筛查与NSG检查提示胎儿颅脑发育异常,并于1周内行胎儿头颅MRI检查的221例病例。根据留存的图像确定胎儿神经系统检查的方法,将只有3个基本横切面者分为筛查组(111例),将有10个平面者分为NSG组(110例)。根据超声及MRI诊断结果,可分为以下4种情况:超声和MRI均提示一种疾病(A);MRI部分诊断结果与超声一致,但MRI补充了重要的诊断信息(B);超声和MRI分别提示不同的疾病(C);超声异常,但MRI正常(D)。将2组超声与MRI诊断结果进行分析。采用t检验和z。检验进行统计学分析。结果NSG组和筛查组中属于A的比例分别为70.9%(78/110)与44.1%(49/111),B为7.3%(8/110)与8.1%(9/111),C为3.6%(4/110)与21.6%(24/111),D为18.2%(20/110)与26.1%(29/111)。而NSG组的超声诊断与MRI诊断的一致性高于筛查组(χ^2=18.985,P〈0.001)。结论与胎儿颅脑超声筛查的诊断相比,NSG与MRI有更好的一致性,提示NSG检查对于胎儿神经系统畸形的诊断具有重要的价值。 Objective To evaluate the consistency of fetal brain ultrasound screening and neurosonogram (NSG) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the clinical values of ultrasound and NSG in the diagnosis of fetal nervous system abnormalities, and the values of NSG in the diagnosis of fetal brain malformations. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 221 gravidas who were diagnosed with fetal brain development abnormality by ultrasound screening or NSG in Peking University First Hospital between January 2012 and July 2015 and received fetal brain MRI within one week after ultrasound examination. According to the saved images, the 221 cases were divided into two groups: fetal brain ultrasound basic screening group (111 cases) which had three basic transverse planes and NSG group (110 cases) which had ten basic transverse planes. There were four conditions according to the diagnostic results of ultrasonography and MRI: ultrasonography and MRI suggesting the same diseases (A); ultrasonography and MRI suggesting the same diseases, but MRI providing more information for diagnosis (B); ultrasonography and MRI suggesting different diseases (C); ultrasonography suggesting abnormal, but MRI suggesting normal (D). Diagnostic results of ultrasonography and MRI were respectively comparatively analyzed in the two groups. T-test and Chi-test were used for statistical analysis. Results The diagnostic results for NSG group and fetal brain ultrasound basic screening group were listed as follows: A: 70.9%(78/110) and 44.1%(49/111); B: 7.3% (8/110) and 8.1% (9/111); C: 3.6% (4/110) and 21.6% (24/111); D: 18.2% (20/110) and 26.1% (29/111). The consistency with MRI results was higher in NSG group than that of fetal brain ultrasound basic screening group (X^2=18.985, P〈0.001). Conclusions Compared with fetal brain ultrasound basic screening, NSG provides more consistent results with MRI, suggesting its great clinical value in the diagnosis of fetal nervous system malformations.
出处 《中华围产医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2017年第4期244-248,共5页 Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
关键词 神经系统畸形 超声检查 产前 磁共振成像 中枢神经系统 Nervous system malformations Ultrasonography, prenatal Magnetic resonance imaging Central nervous system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1Angtuaco TL. Ultrasound imaging of fetal brain abnormalities: three essential anatomical level. Ultrasound Q, 2005,21(4):287-294.
  • 2Correa FF, Lara C, Bellver J, et al. Potential pitfalls in fetal neurosonography. Prenat Diagn, 2006,26 (1) : 52-56.
  • 3Toi A, Chitayat D, Blaser S. Abnormalities of the foetal cerebral cortex. Prenat Diagn, 2009,29(4) :355-371.
  • 4Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T. Normal and abnormal fetal brain development during the third trimester as demonstrated by neurosonography. Eur J Radiol, 2006,57(2) :226-232.
  • 5Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S. The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 181(2): 446-454.
  • 6International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the 'basic examination' and the 'fetal neurosonogram'[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 29(1): 109-116.
  • 7Salomon L J, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37( 1): 116-126.
  • 8Gagnon A, Wilson RD, Allen VM, et al. Evaluation of prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009, 31(9): 875 881,882-889.
  • 9Romosan G, Henriksson E, Rylander A, et al. Diagnostic performance of routine ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities in an unselected Swedish population in 2000 2005[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 34(5): 526-533.
  • 10Malinger G, Lerman-Sagie T, Watemberg N, et al. A normal second-trimester ultrasound does not exclude intracranial structural pathology[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 20(1): 51-56.

共引文献41

同被引文献178

引证文献21

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部