摘要
《刑法修正案(九)》确立了贪污罪和受贿罪的"数额"和"非数额情节"并重的双轨定罪量刑标准,但是,新司法解释对这一定罪量刑标准中的"非数额情节"标准存在认识偏差。新司法解释实质上仅规定了定罪量刑的数额标准,它并没有规定单独的、详细的"非数额情节"定罪量刑标准,从而导致"非数额情节"定罪量刑标准不具有明确性,从而不便于司法操作,不利于司法统一,为此,应建构一个科学的"非数额情节"定罪量刑标准体系。为了适应形势变化发展,有必要建立贪污受贿的双轨定罪量刑标准之定期调整机制。为了更好地实现个案公正,要对我国现行的酌定减轻处罚制度进行修改、完善。
Amendment IX to Criminal Law has established a double-track conviction and punishment standard for corruption and bribery considering both amount-related and non-amount circumstances,the latter of which,however,turns out to be confusion in the new judicial interpretation.The new judicial interpretation has essentially clarified only amount-related standards,but not non-amount standards in an independent and detailed manner,which renders non-amount standards unclear and impediments judicial practices and judicial integration.Thus,a scientific system for non-amount conviction and punishment standards is necessary.In adaption to the changing climates,it is imperative to set up a periodic adjustment mechanism for the double-track conviction and punishment standard for corruption and bribery.And in order to better realize justice in individual cases,amendments and optimizations are needed on the principle of discretionary mitigated punishment.
出处
《净月学刊》
2017年第2期43-53,共11页
Journal of Jilin Public Security Academy
关键词
贪污罪
受贿罪
双轨定罪量刑标准
数额
非数额情节
Crime of corruption
Crime of bribery
Double-track conviction and punishment standard
Amount
Non-amount circumstances