期刊文献+

试验序贯分析检验Cochrane泌尿外科学小组Meta分析假阳性结果的研究 被引量:1

Examining the false-positive results of meta-analysis of Cochrane urology group using trial sequential analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的采用试验序贯分析(TSA)检验Cochrane泌尿外科学小组累积Meta分析假阳性结果。方法计算机检索The Cochrane Library(2016年第6期)"Urology Group"的系统评价,查找具有阳性结果的Meta分析。由2位研究者独立进行文献筛选和资料提取,然后采用TSA 0.9β软件进行TSA。结果共纳入11个Meta分析。TSA结果显示,11个Meta分析中,有8个(72.7%)Meta分析的结论既未穿过TSA界值,也未达到期望信息量,为潜在的假阳性结果。结论 TSA可以辅助判断Meta分析的结果是否为假阳性结果。 Objective To detect the false-positive results of cumulative meta-analyses of Cochrane Urology Group with the trial sequential analysis (TSA). Methods The systematic reviews of Urology Group of The Cochrane Library were searched to collect meta-analyses with positive results. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data of included meta-analyses. Then, TSA was performed using TSA software version 0.9 beta. Results A total of 11 meta-analyses were included. The results of TSA showed that, 8 of 11 (72.7%) meta-analyses were potentially false-positive results for failing to surpass the trial sequential monitoring boundary and to reach the required information size. Conclusion TSA can help researchers to identify the false-positive results ofmeta-analyses.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2017年第4期458-462,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划专项基金(编号:2016YFC0106300)
关键词 试验序贯分析 META分析 假阳性 COCHRANE系统评价 Trial sequential analysis Meta-analysis False-positive Cochrane systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献108

  • 1王吉耀.走出循证医学的误区[J].中华医学杂志,2004,84(12):969-970. 被引量:23
  • 2GRADEpro. [Computer program]. Version 3.2 for Windows. Jan Brozek, Andrew Oxman, Holger Schünemann, 2008.
  • 3Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al . Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ , 2008, 337: a744.
  • 4A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet, 1996, 348: 1329-1339.
  • 5Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al. The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1999, 341: 1789-1794.
  • 6Pocock SJ, Hughes MD. Practical problems in interim analyses, with particular regard to estimation. Control Clin Trials, 1989, 10: 209S- 21S.
  • 7Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Adhikari NK, et al. Randomized tri- als stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. JAMA, 2005, 294: 2203-2209.
  • 8Bassler D, Briel M, Montori VM, et al. Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic re- view and meta-regression anarysis, JAMA, 2010, 303: 1180-1187.
  • 9Teo KK, Yusuf S, Collins R, et al. Effects of intravenous magnesium in suspected acute myocardial infarction: overview of randomised trials. BMJ, 1991, 303:1499-1503.
  • 10ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet, 1995, 345: 669-685.

共引文献534

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部