期刊文献+

概况性评价简介 被引量:15

A brief introduction of scoping review
原文传递
导出
摘要 知证决策(informed-evidence decision-making,IEDM)已成为指导政策制定和实践的主要原则,然而最佳证据是保证IEDM成功实施的前提。由于证据类型和综述问题的种类存在多样性,因此发展能更为有效且严格地进行证据识别与合成的方法势在必行。当前已有14种文献研究方法可用于证据的识别与合成,概况性评价(scoping review)是其中之一。本文将从发展背景、目的及方法学框架等方面对概况性评价进行介绍,并通过实例来展示该方法的具体应用,以推动该方法在国内的传播与应用。 Informed-evidence decision-making (IEDM) has emerged as the predominant principle of providing guidance for policy-making and practice, however, the best available evidences requisite of performing successfully IEDM. Different forms of evidence and different kinds of review questions call for the development of new approaches that are designed to more effectively and rigorously identify and synthesize the evidence. Fourteen methods of reviewing literature have been recently used to identify and synthesize evidence, of which scoping reviews is increasing popular. This article introduces aspects such as background, purpose and methodological frame work and explains the process of it with an example so that facilitating the dissemination and utilization of scoping review in China.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2017年第4期488-493,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 第三军医大学临床护理创新项目(编号:SWHLKJ)
关键词 知证决策 证据合成 政策制定 概况性评价 Informed-evidence decision-making Evidence synthesis Policy making Scoping review
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献72

  • 1邬兰,张永,曾宪涛.QUADAS-2在诊断准确性研究的质量评价工具中的应用[J].湖北医药学院学报,2013,32(3):201-208. 被引量:103
  • 2Volmink J, Siegfried N, Robertson K, et al. Research synthesis and dissemination as a bridge to knowledge management: the Cochrane Collaboration. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2004, 82: 778-783.
  • 3Chalmers I, Hedges L, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 2002, 25(1): 12-37.
  • 4Cochrane A. Chief editor. Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972.
  • 5Cochrane AL. A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In Medicines for the year 2000 (pp. 1-11). London: Office of Health Economics. 1979. 1931-1971.
  • 6Furberg CD.Effect of anti-arrhythmic drugs on mortality after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiaol, 1983, 52: 240-248.
  • 7Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic Reviews. Second edition. BMA House: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001: 5.
  • 8Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane- handbook.org.
  • 9Lisa AB, Roberto G, Jeremy MG, et al. Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote implementation of research findings by health care professional. BMJ, 1998, 317: 465-468.
  • 10Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S, et al. SUPPORT Tools for Evidence- informed Health Policymaking (STP): What is Evidence-informed Policymaking? Health Research Policy and Systems, 2009, 7(Suppl 1): Ildoi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-11.

共引文献98

同被引文献222

引证文献15

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部