摘要
当代知识论学者对理解的探究热情日益高涨。其中涉及理解是否是一种知识的争论。理解知识说的主要代表人物格林姆指出,理解是一种know-how,是一种因果知识。这一主张遭到了来自普理查德、扎格泽伯斯基、卡凡维格等人的质疑。尽管格林姆对这些质疑作出了回应,但其主张仍有一些不足。"理解的融贯知识论"认为理解是各类知识的融贯混合体,这一理论不仅有足够的理论张力,还能为行动提供好的向导。
Today more and more epistemologists show their interests on the theory of the understanding, including whether understanding is a species of knowledge. Stephen R. Grimm saw understanding as know- how, a kind of causal knowledge. However, Pritchard, Zagzebski, Kvanvig objected what Grimm said. Though Grimm gave some replies, his theory has some other problems. Then a theory of understanding as the coherence of knowledge arise, it holds that varies kinds of knowledge constitute understanding. This theory not only has enough theory tension, but also can provide rational guidance for actions.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期3-9,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社科基金项目"实验知识论"(14BZX067)
国家社科基金重大项目"基于虚拟现实的实验研究对实验哲学的超越"(15ZDB016)
国家社科基金重大项目"当代知识论的系列研究"(14ZDB012)
关键词
理解
知识
知识论
understanding
knowledge
epistemology