摘要
"纯文学"概念不符合文学生产事实,在"重写文学史"等实践中亦未成为研究事实,但这一概念却将长久存在下去。作为一种文学生产类型,它拥有独特的动力、策略、机制和效果。它既可能以"尘嚣缰锁"之外"诗的境界"引人喜爱,亦可能因对现实权力关系的"一概不理会"而失去读者信任。在文学生产中吸收"纯文学"之于"文学性"的诉求,在研究中告别"纯文学"而将视野延伸至"历史深处"的"力的关系",都是必要而切实的选择。
The concept of "pure literature" does not conform to the facts of literary production and has not become a research fact in the practice of "rewriting literary history", but this concept will persist for a long time. As a type of literary production, it has a unique power, strategy, mechanism and effect. It may be attractive for "poetry of the realm" a stone away from the "secular world", but it also loses the trust of readers because of its ignoring the literary affinity to reality. It is therefore both necessary and practical for writers to get at the "literariness" of "pure literature" and researchers to bid farewell to "pure literature" and to extend their vision to the "matrix of power" in the depth of history.
出处
《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期118-122,共5页
Journal of Capital Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词
当代文学
纯文学
历史化
contemporary literature
pure literature
historical