期刊文献+

声景观对视觉美学感知效应的影响 被引量:8

Influences of soundscape on visual aesthetics preference
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探索环境声音对人们美学感知的作用,通过在城市公园中拍摄的20张照片作为视觉美学评价的媒介,选取五种声音与照片进行配对组合,以大学生为评判者对该组合的美学价值进行了定量评价。结果显示:纯视觉的美学质量与添加了流水声及鸟鸣声的美学质量相比存在显著差异,而与添加了风声、古典音乐和现代轻音乐的美学质量差异不显著;把流水声设置在拥有自然水体,较高植被覆盖率以及较多大树的环境中能够充分发挥流水声的美学效应,而把鸟鸣声放置在植被覆盖度较高的环境中能够更多地提升游人的环境美学体验;声音的视觉联想以及该联想与声音所处环境的吻合程度对于人们的美学感知较为重要;声景观设计的关键在于选择或创建与声音的视觉联想相一致的环境。 To explore the effects of soundscape on peo- ple' s visual aesthetic preference, 5 types of sound and 20 pho- tos taken in public parks are selected and combined as the stim- uli of aesthetic preference evaluated by undergraduates. The re- sults indicate that there are significant differences between the aesthetic preference of photos and the aesthetic preference of photo - sound of water flowing combination and of photo - bird singing combination, but no significant differences between pho- tos and the combinations of photo - sound of wind, photo - sound of traditional Chinese music and photo - sound of modern soft music, respectively; it will increase the efficiency of sound of water flowing on aesthetic preference if this sound is added to the landscape containing natural water body, higher vegetation cover and more mature plants, while putting the bird singing in an environment with higher vegetation cover should enhance en- vironmental appealing more significantly. In addition, the visual associations of a sound and the coherence between the associa- tions and physical landscape take a great influence on people' s aesthetic experience. Thus the key of soundscape design is to find or build a landscape complying with the visual associations of a sound.
出处 《城市问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期41-46,51,共7页 Urban Problems
基金 教育部人文社会科学一般项目(16YJA760052)--声景观对视觉审美的效应及其应用研究
关键词 声景观 视觉美学 感知效应 soundscape visual landscape aesthetic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1葛坚,赵秀敏,石坚韧.城市景观中的声景观解析与设计[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2004,38(8):994-999. 被引量:106
  • 2秦佑国.声景学的范畴[J].建筑学报,2005(1):45-46. 被引量:126
  • 3朱晓霞.园林中的声境美[J].园林,2007,24(4):12-13. 被引量:9
  • 4[6]Anderson LM,Milligan BE,Goodman LS,et al.1983.Effects of sounds on preferences for out door settings[J].Environ.Behav.,15:539~566.
  • 5[7]Arriaza M,Canas-Ortega JF,Gannas-Maduenno JA,et al.2004.Assessing the visual quality of rural landscape[J].Landsc.Urban Plan.,69:115~125.
  • 6[8]Arthux LM.1977.Predicting scenic beauty of forest environments:Some empirical tests[J].For.Sci.,23:151~160.
  • 7[9]Buhyoff GJ,Wellman JD.1983.Landscape preference metrics,an international comparison[J].J.Environ.Manage.,16:181~190.
  • 8[10]Clay GR,Smids RK.2004.Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis[J].Lanlsc.Urban Plan.,66:239~255.
  • 9[11]Daniel TC,Boster RS.1976.Measuring Landscape Aesthetics:The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method[R].USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.Fort Collins,CO:Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
  • 10[12]Daniel TC,Michael MM.2001.Representational validity of landscape visualizations:The effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas[J].J.Environ.Psychol.,21:61~72.

共引文献325

同被引文献75

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部