期刊文献+

PHQ-9在综合医院住院患者中信效度研究 被引量:71

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of PHQ-9 in general hospital inpatients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的检验病人健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)在综合医院住院患者中应用的信度和效度,探索PHQ-9在综合医院住院患者中快速筛查抑郁的可行性。方法方便抽取四川大学华西医院569名住院患者,在规定指导语下完成PHQ-9评定,采用随机数字表法随机抽取38名患者在完成初次评定2周后进行PHQ-9重测;以简明国际神经精神访谈(MINI)作为"金标准",评估中文版PHQ-9的效标效度,共139名患者接受MINI中文版访谈。结果 PHQ-9在本研究中的Cronbach'sα系数为0.839,各条目与总评分的相关系数r=0.484~0.724(P<0.01),各条目间相关系数r=0.229~0.520(P<0.01);两周后重测系数r=0.846(P<0.01);因子分析获得3个公因子,分别为自我评价因子、情感因子和躯体化因子;最佳诊断划界分为8分,敏感度为92.6%,特异度为60.6%;PHQ-9的ROC曲线下面积为0.841(95%CI:0.777~0.905)。结论 PHQ-9应用于综合医院住院患者抑郁评估中具有良好的信效度,8分为该量表的最佳划界分。 Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of Patients'Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-9 item (PHQ -9) in general hospital inpatients and to explore the feasibility of PHQ-9 in screening hospitalized patients in general hospital.Methods To facilitate the extraction of 569 hospitalized patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University,PHQ-9 was completed under the specified guidance.38 patients were randomly selected by random number table and PHQ -9 retest was performed after 2 weeks of initial evaluation.Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview( MINI) was used as the “gold standard” to evaluate the efficacy and validity of the Chinese version of PHQ-9.A total of 139 patients were interviewed by MINI Chinese version.Results The Cronbach's a coefficient of PHQ -9 was 0.839 and the 2-week test-retest reliability was 0.846.The correlation coefficient of the items and total score was 0.484-0.724 ( P〈0.01 ) and between items was 0.229-0.520( P〈0.01) .Factor analysis suggested a three-factor solution self-assessment factor,affective factor and somatic symptom factor.The best diagnostic demarcation point is 8,maximizing the Youden Index,yielded a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 60.6% .The results of ROC analysis indicated that the area under the curve ( AUC) was 0.841 (95% C7: 0.777-0.905) .Conclusion The Chinese version of PHQ-9 was shown to have good reliability and validity in general hospital inpatients.8 is the best demarcation of the scale points.
出处 《四川精神卫生》 2017年第2期149-153,共5页 Sichuan Mental Health
关键词 PHQ-9 信度 效度 综合医院 住院患者 PHQ-9 Reliability Validity General hospital Inpatients
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1张志群,郭兰婷.Beck抑郁问卷在成都市中学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(7):486-487. 被引量:16
  • 2胡宪章,翁孝钢,张绍荣,朱金富,张迎黎.综合医院内科住院病人的精神障碍[J].临床精神医学杂志,1995,5(6):340-342. 被引量:34
  • 3朱俊娟,陆峥,蔡军,施慎逊,季建林,朱荣申,史以珏,蒋有倩,王崇顺,丁有菊.综合医院医学心理门诊医师对抑郁症的识别[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(6):339-342. 被引量:7
  • 4周绍辉,朱晓峰,王德.综合医院开展心理卫生服务的经验与体会[J].中华医院管理杂志,1997,13(1):35-37. 被引量:18
  • 5Balestrieri M, Bisofll G, Tansella M, et al. Identification of depression by medical and surgical general hospital physicians, Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2002, 24:4-11.
  • 6Isacson D, Bingefors K, yon Knorring L. The impact of depression is unevenly distributed in the population. Eur Psychiatry, 2005, 20:205-212.
  • 7Thompson C, Kinmonth AL, Stevens L, et al. Effects of a clinical-practice guideline and practice-based education on detection and outcome of depression in primary care: Hampshire Depression Project randomized controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 355:185-191.
  • 8叶维菲 施寿康 徐俊冕.957例住院病人焦虑医院障碍的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1995,4(4):198-198.
  • 9Highet NJ,McNair BG,Davenport TA,et al.How much more can we lose? carer and family perspectives on living with a person with depression.Med J Aust,2004,181(7 Suppl):S6 -9.
  • 10Unutzer J,Katon W,Williams JW,et al.Improving primary care for depression in late life:the design of a multicenter randomized trial.Med Care,2001,39(8):785 -99.

共引文献300

同被引文献651

引证文献71

二级引证文献466

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部