期刊文献+

标准联盟组合嵌入性社会资本对企业创新绩效的影响研究 被引量:19

Social Capital Embedded in Standard Alliance Portfolio and Its Impact on Enterprises' Innovation Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合创新搜索理论、社会资本理论与社会网络分析法,从联盟组合的视角出发,研究焦点企业应该如何设计与管理其技术标准联盟组合以获得更高的创新绩效.本文以中国汽车产业360家参与正式标准制定企业的标准联盟组合(共7个时间窗口)为研究对象进行大样本实证研究,结果表明:在标准联盟组合中,企业拥有的关系数量越多,其创新绩效越高;关系强度调节关系数量与企业创新绩效之间的关系;企业个体网络密度越稀疏,其创新绩效越高;关系强度削弱了网络密度与企业创新绩效之间的负相关性,当关系强度增大时,稀疏网络对企业创新绩效的促进作用会减小. Draw on theories of innovation search, social capital and social network analysis ( SNA), it aimed to help firms design and manage their standard alliance portfolios to achieve a better innovation performance. Based on the net-work-level data of standards alliances of Chinese automobile industry, it established standard alliance portfolio for 360 firms in formal standard setting activities by constructing 7 adjacency matrices. The results of empirical test show that enterprises with a larger number of direct ties will achieve better innovation performance ; the strength of ties has negative influence on the relationship between direct ties and innovative performance; enterprises with a sparse network will achieve better innovation performance; the strength of ties has negative influence on the relationship between density and innovation performance.
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期93-101,共9页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目"自主创新背景下我国高技术产业标准化战略与政策研究"(71233002) 国家自然科学基金资助项目"基于专利池的高科技产业技术标准开发联盟内外部治理机制研究"(71273085) "基于平台的高新技术产业专利池开发联盟内外部治理机制研究"(71373074)
关键词 标准联盟 联盟组合 关系强度 社会资本 创新绩效 standard alliance alliance portfolio strength of ties social capital innovation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献24

  • 1罗珉,何长见.组织间关系:界面规则与治理机制[J].中国工业经济,2006(5):87-95. 被引量:105
  • 2Adam M. Brandenburger, Harborne W.Stuart Jr. Value-Based Business Strategy [J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1996,5(1).
  • 3Christine M. Beckman, Pamela R Haunschild, Damon J. Phillips. Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty,and Network Partner Selection[J]. Organization Science,2004,15(3).
  • 4Dover Lavie. Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U. S. Software Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(12).
  • 5Dovev Lavie, Christoph Lechner, Harbir Singh. The Performance Implications of Timing of Entry and Involvement in Muhipartner Alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3).
  • 6Glenn Hoetkerl, Thomas MeUewigt. Choice and Performance of Governance Mechanisms: Matching Alliance Governance to Asset Type[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(10).
  • 7Henri C. Dekker. Control of Inter-Organizational Relationships: Evidence on Appropriation Concerns and Coordination Requirements[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society,2004,29(1 ).
  • 8Henri C. Dekker. Partner Selection and Governance Design in Interfirm Relationships [J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2008,33 (7/8).
  • 9Jeffrey H. Dyer, Harbir Singh. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Inter-Organizational Competitive Advantage[J]. The Academy of Management Review,1998,23(4).
  • 10Jeffrey H. Dyer, Harbir Singh, Prashant Kale. Splitting the Pie: Rent Distribution in Alliances and Networks[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics,2008,29(2/3).

共引文献43

同被引文献312

引证文献19

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部