期刊文献+

恶性脑胶质瘤同步放化疗后血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度变化及其临床意义 被引量:12

Concentration Change of Serum TGF-β and GFAP and Their Clinical Significance in Patients with Malignant Brain Glioma Treated by Concomitant Radiochemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨脑胶质瘤患者治疗后血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度的变化对其预后的影响。方法选择Ⅲ~Ⅳ级脑胶质瘤患者56例,采用术后三维适形放疗联合口服替莫唑胺化疗。分别于术前、术后1周和放化疗结束后抽取患者静脉血3 ml检测血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度。结果Ⅲ级脑胶质瘤患者血清TGF-β浓度显著低于Ⅳ级脑胶质瘤患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Ⅲ级脑胶质瘤患者血清GFAP浓度显著高于Ⅳ级脑胶质瘤患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与术前比较,术后1周和放化疗结束后患者血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与术后1周比较,放化疗结束后患者血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同疗效组患者血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度差异显著(P<0.05);与CR组比较,SD、PD组患者血清TGF-β浓度显著升高,PR、SD、PD组患者血清GFAP浓度显著升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与PR组比较,SD、PD组患者血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度均显著升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与SD组比较,PD组患者血清TGF-β和GFAP浓度均显著升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 TGF-β和GFAP是评估脑恶性胶质瘤疗效及预后的良好血清标志物,具有重要的临床价值。 Objective To investigate the serum TGF-β and GFAP concentration changes in patients with malignant brain glioma and its influence on prognosis. Methods A total of 56 cases of stage m - IV brain glioma patients were selected. All the patients used postoperative three dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with oral administration of chemotherapy for treatment. The serum TGF-β and GFAP at the preoperative, postoperative 1 week and after the end of radiochemotherapy were detected. Results The serum TGF-β concentration of grade m brain glioma patients was significantly lower than that of the grade Ⅳ glioma patients and the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). The level of serum GFAP in patients with grade Ⅲ glioma was significantly higher than that in patients with grade Ⅳ gliomas, and the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with the preoperative,the serum TGF-β and GFAP concentration decreased significantly at 1 week postoperative chemotherapy and after radiochemotherapy, the differences were statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with 1 weeks after surgery, serum TGF-β and GFAP concentrations were significantly decreased in patients after radiochemotherapy, and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈0.05 ). The difference of serum levels of TGF-β and GFAP concentration was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with the CR group, serum TGF-β concentration in patients of SD and PD group increased significantly, and serum GFAP concentration in patients of PR, SD, PD groups increased significantly, the differences were statistically significant (P 〈 0.05 ). Compared with the PR group ,the serum levels of TGF-β and GFAP were significantly increased in patients of SD and PD group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Compared with the SD group, the serum levels of TGF-β and GFAP were significantly increased in patients of PD group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion TGF-β and GFAP are good serum markers for the evaluation of the curative effect and prognosis of brain malignant glioma, which has important clinical value.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2017年第5期722-724,734,共4页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
基金 江苏省徐州市科技项目(编号:KC14SH029)
关键词 转化生长因子 胶质纤维酸性蛋白 恶性脑胶质瘤 放化疗 Transforming growth factor Glial fiber acidic protein Malignant brain glioma Radiochemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1Mar CK, Eimoto T, Nagaya S, et al. Cell proliferation marker MCM2,but not Ki67,is helpful for distinguishing between minimally invasive follicular carcinoma and follicular ade- noma of the thyroid [J]. Histopathotogy, 2006,48 (7) : 801- 807.
  • 2Arshad H,Ahmad Z, Hasan SH. Gliomas :correlation of hi sto- logic grade,Ki67 and p53 expression with patient survival [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2010,11 (6) : 1637-1640.
  • 3Middeldorp J, Hol EM.GFAP in health and disease[J]. Prog Neurobiol, 2011,93 (3) : 421-443.
  • 4Elobeid A,Bongcam-Rudloff E,Westermark B,et al. Effects of inducible glial fibrillary acidic protein on glioma cell motil- ity and proliferation [J]. J Neurosci Res ,2000,60(2):245- 256.
  • 5Gerth AMJ,Deighton RF,McCulloch J,et al. Proteomic studies in low-grade gliomas :what have they informed about pathophysiology?[J]. Diffuse Low-grade Gliomas in Adults,2013,2:117-136.
  • 6Chen F,Becker A J, Loturco JJ. Contribution of Tumor Het- erogeneity in a New Animal Model of CNS Tumors [J]. Mol Cancer Res,2014,5(2) : 1213-1241.
  • 7Wei P,Zhang W,Yang LS. Serum GFAP autoantibody as an ELISA-detectable glioma marker [J]. 2013,34(4):2283- 2292.
  • 8QI S T, YU L, LU Y T, et al. IDH mutations occur frequently in Chinese gIioma patients and predict longer survival but not re- sponse to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in anaplastic gliomas [J]. Oncol Rep, 2011,26(6) : 1479 - 1485.
  • 9FAR1AS EISNER G, BANK A M, HWANG B Y, et al. Glioblas- toma bio- markers from bench to bedside: advances and challen- ges[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2012, 26(2) : 189 - 194.
  • 10VALENTINI V, CELLINI F, MINSKY B D, et al. Survival after radiotherapy in gastric cancer: systematic review and meta- analy- sis[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2009, 92(2) : 176 - 183.

共引文献14

同被引文献109

引证文献12

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部