期刊文献+

低位小水囊与米索前列醇用于孕晚期引产的比较 被引量:14

Comparison of Low Water Sac and Misoprostol for Late Pregnancy Induction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究探讨Foley尿管低位小水囊与小剂量米索前列醇用于孕晚期引产治疗的疗效比较.方法将102例有引产指征的孕妇,随机分为2组,水囊组50例,米索前列醇组52例,观察比较2组促宫颈成熟有效性、孕妇依从性、不良反应、分娩结局(临产开始时间、第一产程时间、阴道分娩率、分娩期胎儿窘迫发生率、新生儿Apgar评分)等2组间差异是否有统计学意义.结果米索前列醇组孕妇依从性高于水囊组(P<0.01),阴道分娩率高于水囊组(P<0.05);水囊组置入水囊时少量宫颈出血发生率高于米索前列醇组(P<0.05),米索前列醇组宫缩过频发生率高于水囊组(P<0.05);促宫颈成熟有效性、临产开始时间、第一产程时间、分娩期胎儿窘迫发生率及新生儿Apgar评分比较,2组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论两者用于孕晚期引产均较安全、有效,不增加宫内感染率及分娩期胎儿窘迫发生率;小剂量米索前列醇孕妇依从性高,更易被孕妇接受,且阴道分娩率更高,但宫缩过频发生率较高,而水囊少量宫颈出血发生率高. Objective To investigate the effect of low water sac of Foley catheter and low dose of misoprostol for late pregnancy induction. Methods One hundred and two patients with induced abortion were randomly divided into 2 groups, 50 cases in the water sac group and 52 cases were in misoprostol group. The effectiveness of cervical ripening, pregnant women compliance, adverse reactions and birth outcomes (in the start time, the first stage of labor time, vaginal delivery rate, fetal distress incidence period and neonatal Apgar score) were observed and statistically compared between the two groups. Results The compliance of pregnant women in misoprostol group is higher than those in water sac group (P〈0.01) , vaginal delivery rate in misoprostol group is higher than those in water sac group (P〈0.05) ; the incidence of a small amount of cervical bleeding is higher when the water bag was inserted in the water sac group (P〈0.05) . The uterine contraction frequency in misoprostol group is higher than in the water sac group (P〈0.05) ; the effectiveness of cervical ripening, medication to labor time, first labor time, incidence of fetal distress and neonatal Apgar score of two groups are not significant difference (P :〉0.05) Conclusions Both of these medicines for late pregnancy induction are safe and effective; they don't increase the rate of intrauterine infection and neonatal outcome. The compliance of pregnant women with small dose of misoprostol is higher. The small dose of misoprostol is more susceptible to pregnant women, and has a higher rate of vaginal delivery. But the uterine contraction frequency with small dose of misoprostol is higher. The small amount of cervical bleeding with the water sac is higher.
出处 《昆明医科大学学报》 CAS 2017年第3期135-138,共4页 Journal of Kunming Medical University
基金 河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划基金资助指令性项目(20150091)
关键词 低位小水囊 米索前列醇 促宫颈成熟 依从性 分娩结局 Low small water sac Misoprostol Cervical ripening Compliance Delivery outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献45

  • 1柴惠霞,王宇珍,马淑华.低位水囊促宫颈成熟42例分析[J].辽宁医学杂志,2004,18(1):52-53. 被引量:1
  • 2尹春艳,王保平,周敬珍,吕小燕,张翠琼,何桂华,陈建飞.晚期妊娠米索前列醇引产的子宫收缩和产程特点[J].实用妇产科杂志,2005,21(11):668-671. 被引量:16
  • 3毛红梅,李建玲.低位水囊促宫颈成熟的临床观察[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2006,14(3):178-178. 被引量:7
  • 4李楠,马玉燕.超小水囊联合米索前列醇直肠给药用于足月妊娠引产临床观察[J].山东医药,2007,47(12):59-60. 被引量:3
  • 5王淑贞,袁耀锷,苏应宽,等.实用妇产科学.人民卫生出版社,1989:956.
  • 6曹泽毅.中华妇产科学(下册)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:2537.
  • 7张小维.妇产科热点问题聚焦.北京大学医学出版社,2006:532.
  • 8Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O'Neill MJ, et al. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised con- trolled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and ]?GE2 gel[ J]. BJOG,2009,116( 11 ) : 1,443 - 1452.
  • 9Vaknin Z, Kurzweil Y, Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction : a sys- tematic review and tneta analysis [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gyneco1,2010,203 (5) :418 -429.
  • 10Levy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, et al. A randomized trial compariJg a 30 ml and an 80 ml Foley catheter balloon for preinductian cervical ripening [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2004,191 ( 5 ) : 1632 - 1636.

共引文献383

同被引文献108

引证文献14

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部