摘要
目的分析阑尾微创和传统切除术的效果及护理重点。方法选取2015年1月—2016年11月在我院接受微创手术治疗的51例阑尾炎患者作为微创组;另外选取同期在我院接受传统切除术治疗的47例阑尾炎患者作为开腹组,对比两组手术相关指标与护理满意度。结果研究微创组患者术后排气时间、住院时间均短于开腹组(P<0.05);两组患者对护理工作满意度均超过90%,两组对比,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论根据阑尾微创和传统切除术的性质,予以患者针对性护理,能够提高护理质量、治疗安全性与满意度。
Objective To analyze the effect and nursing on minimally invasive and conventional analysis of appendix resection. Methods 51 cases of appendicitis treated by minimally invasive surgery in our hospital from January 2015 to November 2016 were selected as minimally invasive group. In addition, 47 cases of appendicitis treated in our hospital during the same period were selected as the treatment group, Comparison of two groups of surgical related indicators and nursing satisfaction. Results The postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time of the minimally invasive group were shorter than those of the open group (P 〈 0.05). Two groups of patients with nursing satisfaction were more than 90%, there was no significant difference between two groups (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion According to the characteristics of minimally invasive surgery and traditional appendectomy, targeted nursing care can improve the quality of care, treatment safety and satisfaction.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第8期146-147,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
阑尾微创
传统切除术
阑尾炎
minimally invasive
conventional appendectomy
appendicitis