期刊文献+

阑尾微创和传统切除术的对比护理分析

Comparative Nursing Analysis of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Appendectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析阑尾微创和传统切除术的效果及护理重点。方法选取2015年1月—2016年11月在我院接受微创手术治疗的51例阑尾炎患者作为微创组;另外选取同期在我院接受传统切除术治疗的47例阑尾炎患者作为开腹组,对比两组手术相关指标与护理满意度。结果研究微创组患者术后排气时间、住院时间均短于开腹组(P<0.05);两组患者对护理工作满意度均超过90%,两组对比,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论根据阑尾微创和传统切除术的性质,予以患者针对性护理,能够提高护理质量、治疗安全性与满意度。 Objective To analyze the effect and nursing on minimally invasive and conventional analysis of appendix resection. Methods 51 cases of appendicitis treated by minimally invasive surgery in our hospital from January 2015 to November 2016 were selected as minimally invasive group. In addition, 47 cases of appendicitis treated in our hospital during the same period were selected as the treatment group, Comparison of two groups of surgical related indicators and nursing satisfaction. Results The postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time of the minimally invasive group were shorter than those of the open group (P 〈 0.05). Two groups of patients with nursing satisfaction were more than 90%, there was no significant difference between two groups (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion According to the characteristics of minimally invasive surgery and traditional appendectomy, targeted nursing care can improve the quality of care, treatment safety and satisfaction.
作者 季艳微
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2017年第8期146-147,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 阑尾微创 传统切除术 阑尾炎 minimally invasive conventional appendectomy appendicitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献36

  • 1汪文炼,陈明会.护患沟通技巧培训与评价[J].护理学杂志,2006,21(11):56-57. 被引量:59
  • 2Liu S, Siewert B, Raptopoulos V, et al. Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. J Am Coll Surg,2002,194 ( 3 ) :298-305.
  • 3Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, et al. Laparoscopicappendectomsignificantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendiciti [ J ]. Surg Endosc,2006, 20(3 ) :495-499.
  • 4Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E. Results of laparoscopic vsconven- tional appendectomy in eomplieited appendicitis[ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001,44 ( 11 ) : 1700-1705.
  • 5Hussain A, Mahmood H, Nicholas J, et al. Prevention of intra -abdominal abscess following laparoseopie appendicectomy for perforated appendici- tis: a prospective study [ J ]. Int J Surg,2008,6 (5) :374-377.
  • 6Sauerland S,Lefering R,Neugebauer EAM.Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis (review)[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2010,(10):CD001546.
  • 7Pedersen AG,Petersen OB,Wara P,et al.Randomised control trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy[J].Br J Surg,2001,88(2):200-205.
  • 8Kirshtein B,Bayme M,Domchik S,et al.Complicated appendicitis:laparoscopic or conventional surgery?[J].World J Surg,2007,31(4):744-749.
  • 9Markides G,Subar D,Riyad K.Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis:Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].World J Surg,2010,34(9):2026-2040.
  • 10Narci A,Karaman I,Karaman A,et al.Is peritoneal drainage necessary in childhood perforated appendicitis?-a comparative study[J].J Pediatr Surg,2007,42(11):1864-1868.

共引文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部