期刊文献+

间歇性高容量血液滤过治疗烧伤脓毒症的临床疗效分析 被引量:2

Clinical Analysis of Intermittent High Volume Hemofiltration in the Treatment of Burn Sepsis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析间歇性高容量血液滤过治疗烧伤脓毒症的临床疗效。方法分析选取我院收治的85例烧伤脓毒症患者的资料,依据治疗方案的不同将其分为2组,对照组(41例)行常规治疗,观察组(44例)行PHVHF治疗,对比两组疗效性指标。结果治疗后,观察组APACHEⅡ评分(13.16±2.75)分,心率(94.36±11.25)次/min,IL-6(62.13±20.14)pg/ml,TNF-α(21.53±15.21)pg/ml,对照组分别为(18.23±3.10)分、(98.20±13.20)次/min、(83.12±20.14)pg/ml、(33.45±18.89)pg/ml,观察组各指标水平均优于对照组,比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论烧伤脓毒症予PHVHF治疗,可改善患者血流动力学指标与病情,且有效清除炎性介质。 Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of intermittent high volume hemofiltration in the treatment of burn sepsis. Methods The data of 85 patients with burned sepsis were divided into two groups according to the different treatment regimen. The control group (41 cases) underwent routine treatment. The observation group (44 cases) was treated with PHVHF, and the curative effect indexes were compared. Results After treatment, the APACHE Ⅱ score was (13.16±2.75)points, heart rate was (94.36±11.25) times/rain, IL-6 was (62.13±20.14)pg/ml, TNF-α was (21.53±15.21) pg/ ml in observation group. And the control group was (18.23±3.10) points, (98.20±13.20) times/rain, (83.12±20.14)pg/ml, (33.45±18.89) pg/ml, the observation group were better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Burned sepsis to PHVHF treatment, can improve the patient's hemodynamie parameters and disease, and effective removal of inflammatory mediators.
作者 王华
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2017年第7期33-35,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 间歇性高容量血液滤过 烧伤脓毒症 疗效 intermittent high-volume hemofiltration burn sepsis efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献92

共引文献75

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部