摘要
日本学者村上哲见先生的《宋词研究》体现了其深厚的功力。其在词学通论与唐宋词人的研究如飞卿词论、耆卿词论等方面多有创见;给美成、梦窗、草窗等通常被称为格律派的词人以应有地位,一改以往对梦窗、草窗等词人之偏见。但瑕瑜互见,从论美成词开始,直至草窗词之研究,村上先生相对缺乏对其思想内容的关注与考察,较多强调其艺术之演变传承。显然,村上先生偏重美成到草窗这一派词人词作,着重体察其艺术特征。这一研究特点,既是村上先生宋词研究之长项,也由此注定其研究之局限。
Japanese scholar Tetsumi Murakami displayed his academic power in his Study On Song Ci Poetry, having creative ideas about general theory of ci poetry and the research on ci poets in the Tang and Song dynasty, such as on Wen Tingyun's ci theory and Liu Yong's ci theory. He affirmed the literary position of metrical ci poets, including Zhou Meicheng, Wu Mengchuang, and Zhou Caochuang, and overcame the prejudice against these ci poets. However, Tetsumi Murakami stressed more on their artistic development and inheritance than on their ideological concepts, which is the advantage as well as the limitation of his study.
出处
《文学与文化》
2017年第1期76-83,共8页
Literature and Culture Studies
关键词
村上哲见
宋词研究
评价
不足
Tetsumi Murakami
Study On Song Ci Poetry
Appraisal
Deficiency