期刊文献+

CBA总决赛球队单节得失分分析与攻防特点研究——以2014-2015赛季为例

Single Quarter Score-loss Analysis and Defense-offence Feature Research in CBA Finals——Take 2014-2015 Season as An Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过数据统计、录像观察法等,对CBA总决赛球队单节得、失分和攻守方式统计,目的在于从得失分分布图看两队的整体攻防能力和攻守特点。结论有:辽宁队单节得、失分比较稳定,而北京队具有非正常表现,表现出高得分和低失分,但整体北京队平均得分能力强于辽宁队;防守上北京队质量较高,取得的实效性优于辽宁队;进攻上多以挡拆开始,主要按照挡的动作、按运球队员处理球的动作、系统挡拆分为三类;挡拆方式北京队以接球顺势挡和运球常规挡为主,辽宁队以运球常规挡和反复挡为主,但两队均不具备系统挡拆的能力;在挡拆后处理球上北京队传球给弱侧同伴多于后者,在球的转移和投篮时机选择上北京队优于辽宁队。 Through the data statistics, video observation and other methods, this paper calculates the single quarter score -loss and defense- offence ways, aiming to observe overall offensive and defensive capabilities and characteristics of the 2 teams. Conclusion : Liaoning score - loss in single quarter is stable while Beijing performs abnormally with high score and low loss. The overall average score ability of Beijing is better than Liaoning; Beijing performs better and more effective in defense; offence usually begins from pick and roll and is divided into 3 categories by the action of pick, dibbler' s action and systematical pick and roll ; the main ways of pick and roll for Beijing are by catching the ball and pick along, as well as regular dribbling pick, while for Liaoning, the main ways are by regular dribbling pick and repeatedly pick, however, they neither hold the ability of systematical pick and roll; on the ball distribution after pick and roll, Beijing players passed the ball to the weak side more, and performs better in passing and choosing shoot opportunities.
出处 《体育科技文献通报》 2017年第5期51-53,56,共4页 Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology
关键词 CBA总决赛 单节得失分 挡拆 攻防特点 CBA finals single quarter score -loss pick and roll offensive and defensive characteristics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

共引文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部