期刊文献+

奥马哈系统护理模式对宫颈癌术后患者生存质量的影响 被引量:8

The influence of Omaha systematic nursing model on life quality of postoperative patients suffered from cervical carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨以奥马哈系统为框架的护理模式干预对宫颈癌术后患者生存质量的影响作用。方法将120例宫颈癌术后患者按入院顺序先后随机分为研究组60例和对照组60例,研究组患者以奥马哈系统为框架的护理模式干预,对照组患者给予常规护理,应用90项症状自评表(SCL-90)测定两组宫颈癌术后患者的心理状况,同时采用生存质量核心量表(QOL-C30)评价两组患者的生存质量,并进行对照比较。结果研究组SCL-90评定总分、总均分、阳性项目数、躯体化、强迫、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖和偏执等因子分均低于对照组;研究组QOL-C30评分明显高于对照组,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论对宫颈癌术后患者实施以奥马哈系统为框架的护理模式干预,可明显消除宫颈癌术后患者焦虑、抑郁的心理障碍,能增强患者治疗的信心,从而促进其康复,最大限度地提高宫颈癌术后患者生存质量。 Objective To explore the impact of Omaha Systematic Nursing Model on the life quality of postoperative patients suffered from cervical carcinoma.Methods 120 cases of the postoperative patients suffered from the cervical carcinoma were divided into research group( n = 60) and control group( n = 60) randomly in order. The research group used Omaha Systematic Nursing Model and the control group used normal nursing only.Two groups separately used SCL-90 to test the psychological situation of the patients suffered from the cervical carcinoma and also used QOL-C30 to assess the life quality of the patients,and compared the results. Results The total assessment mark of SCL-90,total average mark,positive items,somatization,force,depressed,dysphoria,hostile,horrible and stubborn factors of the research group were lower than those of the control group.The QOL-C30 assessment mark of the research group was higher than that of the control group( P 0. 01).Conclusions The use of Omaha Systematic Nursing Model could evidently eliminate the psychological barrier of depressed and dysphoria of the patients,intensify the confidence of the patients,so as to improve their recovery and reach maximum degree of the life quality.
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2017年第3期338-340,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 奥马哈系统 护理模式 干预 宫颈癌 生存质量 Omaha System Nursing Model Interference Cervical Carcinoma Quality of Existence
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献59

  • 1王玮.宫颈刮片的细胞学检查在妇科疾病检查中的价值[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(9):171-172. 被引量:1
  • 2Pasero CL Pain Batings: The Fifth Vital Sign. Am J Nurs, 1997,97 (2): 15.
  • 3Lincc. Barriers to the analgesic management of cancer Pain: a comparison of attitudes of Taiwan Residents Patients and their family caregivew Pain, 2000, 88; 7-14.
  • 4Pasero CL Pain Ratings: Tim Fifth Vital Sign. Am J Num, 1997,97 (2): 15.
  • 5王瑛译.癌症疼痛治疗临床实践指南[M].天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,1997,1.4—6.
  • 6郑怀美,苏应宽,主编.妇产科学[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.275.
  • 7郎景和.子宫颈癌预防的现代策略[J].中国医学科学院学报,2007,29(5):575-578. 被引量:223
  • 8谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:310-313.
  • 9世界卫生组织.创建健康和谐生活:遏制中国慢性病流行.(2011-07-26).http://www.shihang.org/zh/news/feature/.
  • 10Martin KS.The Omaha System:a key to practice,documentation and information management.2nd ed.Omaha NE:Health Connections Press,2005;359-377.

共引文献120

同被引文献119

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部