期刊文献+

职校校长何以说研究者看到的只是“个别现象”——基于身份话语建构理论对一项研究回应的回应及反思

Why the Vocational School Principal Refers What the Researcher Sees as an Unusual and Exceptional Phenomenon——A Response to and Reflection on a Feedback on a Research Based on Identity Oriented Discourse Construction Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《当中职生说垃圾学校和渣渣老师时,是在说什么?》一文呈阅于涉事学校校长J后,他认为论文指陈的现象完全只是"个别现象",研究者"对职业学校的认识有些偏颇"。从身份话语建构理论来看,校长J至少是"(校政)内务管理者""实践行动者""资源调集者"这三重身份的"集丛体",其主观建构的"研究者"分别对应为"局外介入者""理论指导者""职教同盟军"。通过对校长身份话语转换的识别,其所言"个别现象"便不难得到"理解",且这种"理解"将有助于"对话性"研究伦理之生成。 The author is motivated to an interaction and hence a lasting reflection by a response to his published paper What do the Vocational School Students Imply While Referring to Their School and Teachers as Garbage: A Discourse Analysis of a Relevant Posting on Internet Pagesby one middle vocational school principal who claimed that the phenomena in question was simply an exceptional case and the researcher, i.e. the author, surely harbored biased observation on vocational schools. Based on Identity-Oriented discourse construction theory, the principal bears a triply collective identity, i.e. the administrative manager of the school interual affairs, a practitioner, a coordinator of school resources and his subjective construction of the researcher is an external intruder, a theoretical instructor, and an ally of vocational education respectively.The process of constructing equivalent identities via discourse is filled with contradictions and instabilities though, the so called "exceptional case" would not be difficult to understand if the conversion of the principal's identity-oriented discourse i~ recognized, which, to a further extent, contributes to the generation of research ethics of dialogism.
作者 刘猛 LIU Meng(Institute of Vocational Education, Jiangsu University of Technolog)
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第10期11-14,共4页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 职校领导 个别现象 身份话语建构 “对话性”研究伦理 vocational school authority exceptional case identity discourse construction research ethnics of dialogism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献28

  • 1陈新仁.论语用平衡[J].外语学刊,2004(6):42-47. 被引量:73
  • 2Antaki,C.&.S.Widdicombe.1998.Identities in Talk [C].London:Sage.
  • 3Brewer,M.B.W.Gardner.1996.Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations [J],Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1):83-93.
  • 4Brown,G.& G.Yule.1983.Discourse Analysis [M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Bucholtz,M.K.Hall.2005.Identity and interaction:A sociocultural linguistic approach [J].Discourse Studies 7(4-5):584 - 614.
  • 6Davies,B.&.R.Harre.1990.Positioning:The discursive production of selves [J],Journal for the Theory of SocialBehavior 20 (1):43 - 63.
  • 7De Fina,A.,D.Schiffrin & M.Bamberg.2006.Discourse and Identity [C].Cambridge:CPU.
  • 8Dol6n,R.J.Todoli.2008.Analyzing Identities in Discourse [C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins B.V.
  • 9Grice,H.P.1975.Logic and conversation [C] // P.Cole J.Morgan.Syntax and Semantics vol.3:Speech Acts.NewYork:Academic Press:41-58.
  • 10Hecht,M.L.,M.J.Collier & S.Ribeau.1993.African American Communication % Ethnic Identity and CulturalInterpretation [M].Newbury Park,CA:Sage.

共引文献443

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部