4Fayad AS, Sheikh MG, Zakaria T, et al. Holmium laser enuclea- tion versus bipolar resection of the prostate: a prospective ran- domized study. Which to choose? [ J ]. J Endourol, 2011,25 : 1347-1352.
5Gong YG, He DL, Wang MZ, et al. Holmium laser enueleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial re- suits [J]. J Urol, 2012, 187: 1336-1340.
6Ishikawa R, Shitara T, Wakatabe Y, et al. Relationship between morcellation efficiency and enucleated tissue weight in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for patients with be- nign prostatic hyperplasia [ J]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, 2011, 102: 675-678.
7Hwang JC, Park SM, Lee JB. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: effectiveness, safety, and overcoming of the learning curve [ J]. Korean J Urol, 2010, 51 : 619-624.
8Shah HN,Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, et al. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmiurn laser enucleation of the prostate [J]. J Urol, 2007, 177: 1468-1474.
9TORSH1ZI A D, ZARANDI M H F, TORSHIZI G D, et al. A hy-brid fuzzy-ontology based intelligent system to determine level of severity and treatment recommendation for benign prostatic hy perplasia[J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2013, 113(1): 301-313.
10ZHANG M, FU S, ZHANG Y, et al. Elastic modulus of the prostate: a new non-invasive feature to diagnose bladder outlet obstruction in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Ultra- sound in Medicine and Biolo~, 2014, 40(7~: 1408-1413.
