牟宗三对伊川朱子之“理”的辨析:以“分际”观之

On Mou Zongsan's Discriminate and Analysis about Cheng Yi and Zhu Xi's Concept of Li:From the Perspective of Division

牟宗三先生在其著作《心体与性体》中,为讲明明道与伊川朱子的分际,创造性地提出"形构之理"、"存在之理"以及"归纳普遍化之理"三个范畴,在对三者的比较中展开了其对于程朱理学思想话语的深入辨析。牟先生认为,"形构之理"与"存在之理"区分了形上和形下两种知识;而"存在之理"与"归纳普遍化之理"的区分,则呈现出伊川朱子"格物穷理"工夫论中所隐藏的"成就知识"与"成就德性"两种倾向的分野。牟氏对伊川朱子理学话语的细致分辨,构成了其宋明理学三系说的理论基础。

In the book Xin Ti and Xing Ti, Mou Zongsan comes up with three new categories in order to explain the division between Cheng Yi, Zhu xi and Cheng Hao. After comparing the three, Mou criticizes Cheng Yi and Zhu xi's theory and expresses his own opinion. In his view, depending on the difference between Law of shape and Law of existence,we can distinguish the metaphysical theory and practice theory.Moreover, the difference between Law of existence and Law of inductive generalization presents the division between knowledge and virtue. Those lay the theoretical foundation of Mou's three-schools-theory.